The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Black holes, cosmological singularities and change of signature
Abstract
There exists a widespread belief that signature type change could be used to avoid spacetime singularities. We show that signature change cannot be utilised to this end unless the Einstein equation is abandoned at the suface of signature type change. We also discuss how to solve the initial value problem and show to which extent smooth and discontinuous signature changing solutions are equivalent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is likely that more appropriate (and accurate) results can be achieved by redefining the nucleation probabilities as P ∼ A exp(-I), where A is the one-loop prefactor arising from fluctuations around the Euclidean configuration (see e.g.Refs.[12] and [33]).”
From Dimensionality, topology, energy, the cosmological constant and signature change (1996) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dimensionality, topology, energy, the cosmological constant and signature change
Embacher, F. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/5/012 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kriele, M., & Martin, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1994
- arXiv
- gr-qc/9411063
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black holes, cosmological singularities and change of signature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9411063
- The paper
- Kriele, M., & Martin, J. (1994). Black holes, cosmological singularities and change of signature. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9411063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
