CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Increase of Black Hole Entropy in Higher Curvature Gravity

Jacobson, Ted, Kang, Gungwon, Myers, Robert C.·1995·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9503020arXiv gr-qc/9503020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We examine the Zeroth Law and the Second Law of black hole thermodynamics within the context of effective gravitational actions including higher curvature interactions. We show that entropy can never decrease for quasi-stationary processes in which a black hole accretes positive energy matter, independent of the details of the gravitational action. Within a class of higher curvature theories where the Lagrangian consists of a polynomial in the Ricci scalar, we use a conformally equivalent theory to establish that stationary black hole solutions with a Killing horizon satisfy the Zeroth Law, and that the Second Law holds in general for any dynamical process. We also introduce a new method for establishing the Second Law based on a generalization of the area theorem, which may prove useful for a wider class of Lagrangians. Finally, we show how one can infer the form of the black hole entropy, at least for the Ricci polynomial theories, by integrating the changes of mass and angular momentum in a quasistationary accretion process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9503020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The null energy condition requires that all asymptotically flat or AdS spacetimes have positive ADM mass.

    “and requires that all asymptotically flat or AdS spacetimes to have positive ADM mass [14,12,13].”

    From The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem (2013) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction states that the paper considers only asymptotically flat spaces. The passages on the null energy condition concern black-hole entropy and the Second Law, not a requirement that ADM mass be positive. Searches for ADM mass, AdS, and a positive-energy theorem found no passage supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The null energy condition precludes superluminal communication.

    “and superluminal communication [10,11,12,13]”

    From The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem (2013) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. See for example: N.D. Birrell and P.C.W. Davies, it Quantum fields in curved space, (Cambridge University Press, 1982).
  2. Alternatively, this identification follows from a semiclassical evaluation of the partition function or the density of states in quantum gravity with any action, as has been shown explicitly in the case of Einstein gravity. See for example: S.W. Hawking in General Relativity, An Einstein Centenary Survey, eds. S.W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, 1979);
  3. J.D. Brown and J.W. York, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 1420, gr-qc/9209014. · arXiv
  4. R.M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
  5. S.W. Hawking in General Relativity, An Einstein Centenary Survey, eds. S.W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, 1979).
  6. M. Lu and M. Wise, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 3095, gr-qc/9301021; · arXiv
  7. M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 583, hep-th/9303029. · arXiv
  8. T. Jacobson and R.C. Myers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3684, hep-th/9305016. · arXiv
  9. R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 3427, gr-qc/9307038. · arXiv
  10. M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993), 5697, gr-qc/9307194. · arXiv
  11. V. Iyer and R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 846, gr-qc/9403028. · arXiv
  12. S.W. Hawking and G.R.F. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime (Cambridge University Press, 1973).
  13. R.M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermody- namics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).
  14. T. Jacobson, G. Kang and R.C. Myers, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 6587, gr-qc/9312023. · arXiv
  15. G. Magnano and L.M. Sokolowski, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 5039, gr-qc/9312008; · arXiv
  16. D. Wands, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 269, gr-qc/9307034. · arXiv
  17. T. Jacobson and G. Kang, Class. Quant. Grav. 10 (1993) L1, gr-qc/9307002. · arXiv
  18. L. Parker and J.Z. Simon, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 1339, gr-qc/9211002. · arXiv
  19. K.S. Thorne, W.H. Zurek and R.H. Price, in Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm, eds. K.S. Thorne, R.H. Price and D.A. MacDonald (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1986) p. 280;
  20. W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 25, 942 (1982);
  21. Phys. Rev. D 27, 2271 (1983);
  22. correction: M.J. Radzikowski and W.G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3059 (1988);
  23. R.M. Wald, in Highlights in Gravitation and Cosmology, eds. B.R. Iyer et al (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988);
  24. V.P. Frolov and D.N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3902, gr-qc/9302017. · arXiv
  25. A.O. Barvinskii, Yu.V. Gusev, G.A. Vilkoviskii and V.V. Zhytnikov, J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994) 3543, gr-qc/9404063; · arXiv
  26. J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994) 3525, gr-qc/9404061; 'The One Loop Effective Action and Trace Anomaly in Four-Dimensions', preprint ALBERTA- THY-15-94, hep-th/9404187. · arXiv
  27. C.G. Callan, S.B. Giddings, J.A. Harvey and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) R1005, hep-th/9111056; · arXiv
  28. V. Mukhanov, A. Wipf and A. Zelnikov, Phys. Lett. B332 (1994) 283, hep-th/9403018. · arXiv
  29. R.C. Myers, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 6412, hep-th/9405162. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jacobson, T., Kang, G., & Myers, R. C.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1995
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9503020
arXiv
gr-qc/9503020
References
0
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review