The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Bubble fluctuations in $Ω<1$ inflation
Abstract
In the context of the open inflationary universe, we calculate the amplitude of quantum fluctuations which deform the bubble shape. These give rise to scalar field fluctuations in the open Friedman-Robertson-Walker universe which is contained inside the bubble. One can transform to a new gauge in which matter looks perfectly smooth, and then the perturbations behave as tensor modes (gravitational waves of very long wavelength). For $(1-Ω)<<1$, where $Ω$ is the density parameter, the microwave temperature anisotropies produced by these modes are of order $δT/T\sim H(R_0μl)^{-1/2} (1-Ω)^{l/2}$. Here, $H$ is the expansion rate during inflation, $R_0$ is the intrinsic radius of the bubble at the time of nucleation, $μ$ is the bubble wall tension and $l$ labels the different multipoles ($l>1$). The gravitational backreaction of the bubble has been ignored. In this approximation, $GμR_0<<1$, and the new effect can be much larger than the one due to ordinary gravitational waves generated during inflation (unless, of course, $Ω$ gets too close to one, in which case the new effect disappears).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In previous studies of open inflation, the effects of gravity have not been fully taken into account.
“But in the above studies, the effects of gravity have not been fully taken into account.”
From Quantized gravitational waves in the Milne universe (1997) · cites this paper as [15]
The contribution of gravitational wave perturbations to the CMB anisotropy is not taken into account at all in previous analyses.
“The other is the contribution of gravitational wave perturbations to the CMB anisotropy, which is not taken into account at all in the previous analyses.”
From Quantized gravitational waves in the Milne universe (1997) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- ͓1͔ M. Bucher, A. Goldhaber, and N. Turok, in Trends in Astro- particle Physics, Proceedings of the Workshop, Stockholm, Sweden, 1994, edited by L. Bergstrom et al. ͓Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 43, 173 ͑1995͔͒;
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantized gravitational waves in the Milne universe
Tanaka, T., & Sasaki, M. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.6061 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Garriga, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1996
- arXiv
- gr-qc/9602025
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review