PreprintCited by 33Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The classical limit and the form of the hamiltonian constraint in nonperturbative quantum gravity

Open access
Smolin, Lee·1996·arXiv

Abstract

It is argued that some approaches to non-perturbative quantum general relativity lack a sensible continuum limit that reproduces general relativity. The basic problem is that generic physical states lack long ranged correlations, because the form of the state allows a division into spatial regions, such that no change in the physical state in one region can be measured by observables restricted to another. These disconnected regions have generically finite expectation value of physical volume, which means that the theory has no long ranged correlations or massless particles. One consequence of this is that the $ADM$ energy is unbounded from below, at least when that is defined with respect to a natural notion of quantum asymptotic flatness and a corresponding definition of an operator that measures $E_{ADM}$ (which is given here). These problems occur in Thiemann's new formulation of quantum gravity. Related issues arise in some other approaches such as that of Borissov, Rovelli and Smolin. A new approach to the Hamiltonian constraint, which may avoid the problem of the lack of long ranged correlations, is proposed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9609034

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 33

Authors
Smolin, L.
Corresponding author
Smolin, Lee
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1996
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1952227133
Cited by
33
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
non-perturbative quantum gravity, classical limit, Hamiltonian constraint, ADM energy, continuum limit, long-range correlations, massless particles, quantum general relativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review