The classical limit and the form of the hamiltonian constraint in nonperturbative quantum gravity
Open accessAbstract
It is argued that some approaches to non-perturbative quantum general relativity lack a sensible continuum limit that reproduces general relativity. The basic problem is that generic physical states lack long ranged correlations, because the form of the state allows a division into spatial regions, such that no change in the physical state in one region can be measured by observables restricted to another. These disconnected regions have generically finite expectation value of physical volume, which means that the theory has no long ranged correlations or massless particles. One consequence of this is that the $ADM$ energy is unbounded from below, at least when that is defined with respect to a natural notion of quantum asymptotic flatness and a corresponding definition of an operator that measures $E_{ADM}$ (which is given here). These problems occur in Thiemann's new formulation of quantum gravity. Related issues arise in some other approaches such as that of Borissov, Rovelli and Smolin. A new approach to the Hamiltonian constraint, which may avoid the problem of the lack of long ranged correlations, is proposed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The loss of spacetime interpretation for the SU(2) connection is probably the reason why the quantum constraint algebra does not reproduce the classical one and contains an anomaly.
“In particular, this fact is probably the reason why the quantum constraint algebra does not reproduce the classical one and contains an anomaly [18, 19, 17].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Smolin, L.
- Corresponding author
- Smolin, Lee
- ORCID
- Smolin, Lee
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1996
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- gr-qc/9609034
- OpenAlex
- W1952227133
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- non-perturbative quantum gravity, classical limit, Hamiltonian constraint, ADM energy, continuum limit, long-range correlations, massless particles, quantum general relativity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review