On the Constant that Fixes the Area Spectrum in Canonical Quantum Gravity
Open accessAbstract
The formula for the area eigenvalues that was obtained by many authors within the approach known as loop quantum gravity states that each edge of a spin network contributes an area proportional to sqrt{j(j+1)} times Planck length squared to any surface it transversely intersects. However, some confusion exists in the literature as to a value of the proportionality coefficient. The purpose of this rather technical note is to fix this coefficient. We present a calculation which shows that in a sector of quantum theory based on the connection A=Gamma-gamma*K, where Gamma is the spin connection compatible with the triad field, K is the extrinsic curvature and gamma is Immirzi parameter, the value of the multiplicative factor is 8*pi*gamma. In other words, each edge of a spin network contributes an area 8*pi*gamma*l_p^2*sqrt{j(j+1)} to any surface it transversely intersects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A single edge puncturing a 2-surface transversely contributes an area proportional to √(j(j+1)).
“If a single edge punctures a 2-surface transversely, it contributes an area proportional to √ j ( j +1) [8,9].”
From Quantum geometry and black hole entropy (1998) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [4][4] A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, in Knots and Quantum Gravity , edited by J. Baez (Oxford U.P., Oxford, 1994); J. Baez, Lett. Math. Phys. 31 , 213 (1994); C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. D52 , 5743 (1995); J. Baez, Adv. Math. 117 , 253 (1996). -
- [5][5] G. Immirzi, 'Quantum Gravity and Regge Calculus', gr-qc/9701052; C. Rovelli, T. Thiemann, 'The Immirzi parameter in quantum general relativity', gr-qc/9705059. - · arXiv
- [8][8] A. Ashtekar, Lectures on non-perturbative canonical gravity, World Scientific Publishing Co., 1991. -
- Authors
- Krasnov, K.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Krasnov, Kirill
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L1-L4
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- gr-qc/9709058
- OpenAlex
- W2005910206
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- Immirzi parameter, area spectrum, loop quantum gravity, spin networks, canonical quantum gravity, spin connection, extrinsic curvature, Planck length
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
