Bounds on negative energy densities in flat spacetime
Open accessAbstract
We generalise results of Ford and Roman which place lower bounds -- known as quantum inequalities -- on the renormalised energy density of a quantum field averaged against a choice of sampling function. Ford and Roman derived their results for a specific non-compactly supported sampling function; here we use a different argument to obtain quantum inequalities for a class of smooth, even and non-negative sampling functions which are either compactly supported or decay rapidly at infinity. Our results hold in $d$-dimensional Minkowski space ($d\ge 2$) for the free real scalar field of mass $m\ge 0$. We discuss various features of our bounds in 2 and 4 dimensions. In particular, for massless field theory in 2-dimensional Minkowski space, we show that our quantum inequality is weaker than Flanagan's optimal bound by a factor of 3/2.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the massless case, the quantum inequality takes a simpler expression that takes the same form as the corresponding QWEI derived in [6].
“In the massless case, we have the simpler expression”
From Null energy conditions in quantum field theory (2003) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Null energy conditions in quantum field theory
Fewster, C. J., & Roman, T. A. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.044003 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Fewster, C. J., & Eveson, S. P.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- gr-qc/9805024
- OpenAlex
- W2023104606
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Keywords
- quantum inequalities, negative energy density, sampling functions, Minkowski space, free scalar field, massless scalar field, two-dimensional Minkowski space, four-dimensional Minkowski space, quantum field theory in curved spacetime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
