PreprintCited by 37Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation Theories

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

One-loop stress-tensor renormalization in curved background: the relation between $ζ$-function and point-splitting approaches, and an improved point-splitting procedure

Open access
Moretti, Valter·1998·arXiv

Abstract

We conclude the rigorous analysis of a previous paper concerning the relation between the (Euclidean) point-splitting approach and the local $ζ$-function procedure to renormalize physical quantities at one-loop in (Euclidean) QFT in curved spacetime. The stress tensor is now considered in general $D$-dimensional closed manifolds for positive scalar operators $-Δ+ V(x)$. Results obtained in previous works (in the case D=4 and $V(x) =ξR(x) + m^2$) are rigorously proven and generalized. It is also proven that, in static Euclidean manifolds, the method is compatible with Lorentzian-time analytic continuations. It is found that, for $D>1$, the result of the $ζ$ function procedure is the same obtained from an improved version of the point-splitting method which uses a particular choice of the term $w_0(x,y)$ in the Hadamard expansion of the Green function. This point-splitting procedure works for any value of the field mass $m$. Furthermore, in the case D=4 and $V(x) = ξR(x)+ m^2$, the given procedure generalizes the Euclidean version of Wald's improved point-splitting procedure. The found point-splitting method should work generally, also dropping the hypothesis of a closed manifold, and not depending on the $ζ$-function procedure. This fact is checked in the Euclidean section of Minkowski spacetime for $A = -Δ+ m^2$ where the method gives rise to the correct stress tensor for $m^2 \geq 0$ automatically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9809006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the paper's conventions, when D is even, the anomalous quantum correction to the trace of the stress-energy tensor is -2 cD UD/2(z,z)/(D+2), and it coincides with the conformal anomaly if V ≡ 0 and ξ = ξD in (2).

    “With our conventions, when D is even, the anomalous quantum correction to the trace of the stress-energy tensor is -2 c D U D/ 2 ( z, z ) / ( D + 2) [20] (and coincides with the conformal anomaly if V ≡ 0, ξ = ξ D in (2)).”

    From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Comments (p. 23) say that the usual conformal anomaly arises for even D with conformal coupling, V′ ≡ m² = 0, and a trivial kernel of A. The citing sentence omits the kernel condition and says V ≡ 0 rather than V′ ≡ m² = 0. The trace formula in the Comments (p. 18) is not decoded in our copy, so the stated coefficient cannot be checked. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The left-hand side of (25) coincides with the expression given in Theorem 4.1 of [20] when λ coincides with μ^{-1} up to a suitable positive constant factor.

    “as shown in Theorem 4.1 of [20] provided (using ℏ = c = 1) λ coincides with µ -1 with a suitable positive constant factor.”

    From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Comments (p. 30) explicitly relate the length scale u to the mass scale µ by µ = 2e^−γ/u, supporting the claimed inverse relationship up to a positive constant. The paper establishes the point-splitting relation in Theorem 3.1 (p. 28), not Theorem 4.1, and our copy does not establish that the unspecified left-hand side of the citing paper’s equation (25) is the same expression. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1][1] V. Moretti, Commun. Math. Phys. 201, 327 (1999). -
  2. [2][2] V. Moretti, Phys. Rev. D. 56, 7797 (1997). -
  3. [3][3] R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D. 17, 1477 (1978). -
  4. [4][4] N. D. Birrel and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982). -
  5. [5][5] R.M. Wald, Quantum Field theory and Black Hole Thermodynamics in Curved Spacetime (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994). -
  6. [6][6] S.A. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991). -
  7. [7][7] R.M. Wald, General Relativity (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984). -
  8. [8][8] R. M. Wald, Commun. Math. Phys. 70, 226 (1979). -
  9. [9][9] S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 55, 133 (1977). -
  10. [10][10] E. Elizalde, S.D. Odintsov, A. Romeo, A.A. Bytsenko and S. Zerbini, Zeta Regularization Techniques with Applications (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994). -
  11. [11][11] E. Elizalde, Ten Physical Applications of Spectral Zeta Functions (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995). -
  12. [12][12] J. Schwinger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 37, 452 (1951) -
  13. [13][13] D. Iellici and V. Moretti, Phys. Lett. B. 425, 33 (1998). -
  14. [14][14] W. Tichy, E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D. 58, 124007 (1998) -
  15. [15][15] S.M. Christensen, Phys. Rev. D. 14, 2490 (1976) -
  16. [16][16] S.M. Christensen, Phys. Rev. D. 17, 946 (1978) -
  17. [17][17] P. R. Garabedian, Partial Differential Equations (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1964). -
  18. [18][18] S.L. Adler, J. Lieberman, Y.J. Ng, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 106, 279 (1977). -
  19. [19][19] S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D. 7, 1888 (1973). -
  20. [20][20] I. Chavel, Eigenvalues in Riemannian Geometry (Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, USA, 1984).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moretti, V.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (IT)
Corresponding author
Moretti, Valter
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1998
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
3843-3875
ISSN
0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984380229
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Trento
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
one-loop renormalization, quantum field theory in curved spacetime, zeta function regularization, Hadamard expansion, heat kernel coefficients, trace anomaly, Minkowski space, closed manifolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review