CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 23Particle physics theoretical and experimental studiesAdvanced Mathematical Theories and ApplicationsQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions

Multiple Point Criticality, Nonlocality, and Finetuning in fundamental physics: predictions for Gauge Coupling Constants gives $α^{-1}=136._8\pm 9

Open access
Bennett, Donald L.·1996·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9607341arXiv hep-ph/9607341
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The Multiple Point Criticality Principle (MPCP) states that action parameters - in for example a field theory - take on values corresponding to the junction of a maximum number of phases in the phase diagram of a system that undergoes phase transitions. The phases to which physical significance is ascribed are normally regarded as artifacts of a regulation procedure. In the context of a Y-M lattice gauge theory, the MPCP is applied to the system of different (Planck scale) lattice phases that can be provoked using a suitably generalised action with a gauge group that is taken to be the Planck scale predecessor to the Standard Model Group (SMG) - namely the $N_{gen}$-fold Cartesian product of the SMG. Here $N_{gen}$ is the number of fermion generations. Ambiguities under mappings of the gauge group $SGM^{N_{gen}}$ onto itself result in the Planck scale breakdown to the diagonal subgroup which is isomorphic to the usual SMG. Assuming the validity of the MPCP, the three SMG gauge couplings at the Planck scale are predicted to be equal to the diagonal subgroup couplings correspond- ing to the multiple point action parameters in a lattice gauge theory with the gauge group $SMG^{N_{gen}}$. This prediction gives agreement with experiment to within 10 \% for the non-Abelian couplings and 5\% for the U(1) gauge coup- ling. In a more general context, the MPCP is proposed as a fundamental princi- ple of Nature that can also explain other fine-tuning enigma in high energy physics. It is argued that the MPCP implies having long range nonlocal inter- actions which are identical between fields at all pairs of spacetime points. Such interactions are allowed in a very general form of a reparameterization invariant action. This phenomenologically unobjectionable form of nonlocality would quite naturally be incorporated into our theory as constants of Nature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9607341

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If one requires a degeneracy between three- and four-dimensional vacua as suggested by the multiple point principle, the neutrinos are predicted to be Dirac, with the mass of the lightest neutrino approximately O(1-10) meV.

    “We argue that, if we require a degeneracy between three-and four-dimensional vacua as suggested by the multiple point principle, the neutrinos are predicted to be Dirac, with the mass of the lightest neutrino ≈ O(1-10) meV, which may be tested by future CMB, large scale structure and 21cm line observations.”

    From Weak gravity conjecture, multiple point principle and the standard model landscape (2017) · cites this paper as [34]

    Section 3.2 (pp. 63–64) uses degenerate Higgs-field vacua to formulate the multiple point criticality principle. The available copy does not connect that principle to degeneracy between three- and four-dimensional vacua or predict Dirac neutrinos or a lightest-neutrino mass of 1–10 meV; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The multiple point criticality principle requires the parameters of the theory to be tuned so that there are multiple vacua degenerate in energy.

    “This principle requires that the parameter of the theory to be tuned so that there are multiple vacua that are degenerate in energy.”

    From Weak gravity conjecture, multiple point principle and the standard model landscape (2017) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. [2][2] D.L. Bennett. Multiple Point Criticality and the Avoidence of Paradoxes in the Presence of Non-Locality in Physical Theories: A resume of discusions with H.B. Nielsen during the summer of 1995. Available from Forskningscenter for Livskvalitet, St. Kongensgade 70, DK-1264 Copenhagen as preprint nr. QLRC-95-2; coincides essentially with talk by D. Bennett: "Who's Afraid of the Past" (given 8 August 1995 for the "Cross-Disciplinary Initiative" at the Niels Bohr Institute), September 1995. 23 pages.
  2. [4][4] D.L. Bennett and H.B. Nielsen. Constants of Nature from a Multiple Point Criticality Finetuning Mechanism: Predictions of Standard Model Gauge Cou- plings. In Sally Seidel, editor, The Albuquerque Meeting, The University of New Mexico, pages 1410–1415. Division of Particles and Fields '94 Meeting of the Am. Phys. Soc., Albuquerque, 2-6 August 1994, World Science Pub. Co., Inc., Singapore, August 2-6 1994. Also available as preprint NBI-HE-95-45 from The Niels Bohr Institute.
  3. [5][5] D.L. Bennett, C.D. Froggatt, and H.B. Nielsen. Nonlocality as an Explanation for Finetuning in Nature. In D. Lüst and G. Weight, editor, Proc. XXXVIII International Symposium Ahrenshoop on the Theory of Elementary Particles, Wendish-Rietz, August 30-September 3 1994. Availible as preprint NBI-HE- 95-07 from The Niels Bohr Institute.
  4. [6][6] D.L. Bennett, C.D. Froggatt, and H.B. Nielsen. Nonlocality as an Explana- tion for Finetuning and Field Replication in Nature. In Proceedings of the 7th Adriatic Conference "Theoretical and experimental Perspectives in Par- ticle Phenomenology", Island of Briuni, September 13-20 1994. Available as preprint NBI-95-15 from The Niels Bohr Institute or GUPTA /95/04/1 from the University of Glasgow.
  5. [7][7] C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen. Origin of Symmetries. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1991.
  6. [8][8] H.B. Nielsen. Field Theories Without Fundamental Gauge Symmetries. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A310:261–272, 1983.
  7. [12][12] D.L. Bennett, C.D. Froggatt, and H.B. Nielsen. Multiple Point Criticality, Fine Structure Constants and Mass Hierarchies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on High Energy Physics, July 1994. Availible as preprint NBI-HE- 95-44 from The Niels Bohr Institute.
  8. [13][13] D.L. Bennett, H.B. Nielsen, and I. Picek. Number of Generations Related to Coupling Constants by Confusion. In Proceedings of the XX International Symposium Ahrenshoop on the Theory of Elementary Particles, page 383. Institut für Hochenergiphysik, Akad. der Wissenschaften der DDR, Berlin- Zeuthen, October 13-17 1986.
  9. [14][14] D.L. Bennett, H.B. Nielsen, and I. Picek. Gauge Group Replication as an Explanation for the Smallness of the Finestructure Constant. In E. Wiec- zorek, editor, Proceedings of the XXI International Symposium Ahrenshoop on the Theory of Elementary Particles, pages 287–308. Institut für Hochen- ergi Physik, Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Berlin-Zeuthen, Sellin, October 12-16 1987.
  10. [15][15] H.B. Nielsen, D.L. Bennett, and I. Picek. An Inequality Relating Gauge Cou- pling Constants and the Number of Generations in a String Inspired Model. In Proceedings of the Beijing Workshop on String Theories. World Scientific, Singapore 1988, July 6 - Sept. 5 1987. presented in Beijing in November 1987 by H.B. Nielsen.
  11. [17][17] H.B. Nielsen, D.L. Bennett, and I. Picek. Formulation Using Compactified Dimensions to get an Inequality Relating Coupling Constants and the Number of Generations. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Superstring Theory. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, December 13-24 1987.
  12. [18][18] D.L. Bennett, H.B. Nielsen, and I. Picek. Understanding fine structure con- stants and three generations. In V.A. Petrov, editor, Proceedings of the XI Workshop on High Energy Physics and Field Theory, Protvino, pages 419–27. Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Moscow 1989, Nauka, Moscow 1989, July 5-9 1988. 243
  13. [20][20] H.B. Nielsen and N. Brene. Gauge Glass. In Proceedings of the XVIII In- ternational Symposium on the Theory of Elementary Particles, Ahrenshoop. Institut für Hochenergiphysik, Akad. der Wissenschaften der DDR, Berlin- Zeuthen, 1985, 1984.
  14. [24][24] H.B. Kim and J.E. Kim. Coupling Constant Unification and LEP Data. preprint SNUTP-92-89, 1992. Center for Theoretical Physics and Department ofPhysics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea.
  15. [26][26] D.L. Bennett, N. Brene, and H.B. Nielsen. Random dynamics. In L. Brink, R. Marnelius, J.S. Nilsson, P. Salomonson, and B. Skagerstam, editors, Pro- ceedings of Nobel Symposium 67: Unification of Fundamental Interactions, Marstrand, Sweden, page 158. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2-7 June 1986. Physica Scripta Vol. T15, 1987; Copublished by World Scientific Publishers, London (1988).
  16. [29][29] H.B. Nielsen, D.L. Bennett, and N. Brene. The Random Dynamics Project. In J. Ambjørn and B.J. Durhuus and J.L. Petersen, editor, Recent Develop- ments in Quantum Field Theory,. Proceedings of the Niels Bohr Centennial Conference, Copenhagen, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.
  17. [32][32] S. Chada and H.B. Nielsen. unpublished. see page 26 at reference 10 in C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen: Origins of Symmetry (World Scientific, 1991). 244
  18. [35][35] H.B. Nielsen, S.E. Rugh, and C. Surlykke. Seek Inspiration fron the Standard Model in Order to Go Beyond It. In Proceedings of Conference on Corfu, 1992. available from The Niels Bohr Institute as preprint NBI-HE-93-48.
  19. [36][36] G. Veneziano. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Superstring Theory. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, December 13-24 1987.
  20. [37][37] D.L. Bennett and H.B. Nielsen. Standard Model Couplings from Mean Field Criticality at the Planck Scale and a Maximum Entropy Principle. In D. Axen, D. Bryman, and M. Comyn, editors, Proceedings of the Vancouver Meeting on Particles and Fields '91, page 857. World Scientific Publishing Co., 1992, Singapore, 18-22 August 1991.
  21. [38][38] L. Laperashvili. The Standard Model and Fine Structure Constants in Ran- dom Dynamics of Bennett-Brene-Nielsen-Picek (review in Russian). Yad. Fiz., 57:501, 1994.
  22. [44][44] H.B. Nielsen and M.N. Ninomiya. Baby Universes, Finetuning Problems - A Theory of Everything Robbing the Throne by Killing the Rivals. In Proceedings of the XXII International Symposium Ahrenshoop on the Theory of Elemen- tary Particles. Institut für Hochenergi Physik, Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Berlin-Zeuthen, October 17-21 1988.
  23. [50][50] C. Carlini, V.P. Frolov, M.B. Mensky, I.D. Novokov, and H.H. Soleng. Time Machines: the Principle of Self-Consistency as a Consequence of the Principle of Minimal Action. preprint, June 1995. CERN-TH/95-22 or NORDITA- 95/49A or gr-qc/9506087. · arXiv
  24. [60][60] G. Schierholz. Theta Vacuua, Confinement and Continuum Limit, 1994. avail- able as preprint DESY 94-229.
  25. [66][66] M. Hamermesh. Group Theory. Addison-Wesley, 1962.
  26. [67][67] B.A. Dubrovin, A.T. Fomenko, and S.P. Novikov. Modern Geometry-Methods and Applications. Part II. The Geometry and Topology of Manifolds. Springer- Verlag, 1984.
  27. [69][69] R. Gilmore. Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974.
  28. [71][71] D.L. Bennett and H.B. Nielsen. The Three Yang-Mills Gauge Coupling Con- stants from Planck Scale Criticality and a Entropy Principle. Niels Bohr Preprint nr. NBI-HE-92-02, January 1992. 59 pages.
  29. [81][81] L. O'Raifeartaigh. Group Structure of Gauge Theories. Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  30. [92][92] K. Jørgensen, J.H Ipsen, O.G Moritzen, D.L Bennett, and M. Zuckerman. Computer Simulation of the Interaction of Anaestetics with Lipid Membranes. In E. Mosekilde, editor, Proceedings of the 1991 European Simulation Multi- conference, pages 801–806. Simulation Councils, Inc., 1991.
  31. [93][93] K. Jørgensen, J.H Ipsen, O.G Moritzen, D.L Bennett, and M. Zuckerman. The Effect of Drugs on Membrane Behaviour and Passive Trans-Membrane Per- meability. In Proceedings of the Eleventh School on Biophysics of Membrane Transport, May 3-13 1992. Poland.
  32. [96][96] S. Helgason. Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces. Aca- demic Press, 1978.
  33. [98][98] D.L. Bennett, E. Buturovich, and H.B. Nielsen. SU(5) Symmetry Breaking in a Gauge Glass Model. In T. Goldman and M.M. Nieto, editors, Proceedings of the Am. Phys. Soc. Division of Particle and Fields, Santa Fe, page 352. World Scientific, 1984. 248
  34. [99][99] H.B. Nielsen and D.L. Bennett. The Gauge Glass: a short review. Nordita preprint 85/23 (1985).
  35. [101][101] V.G. Bornyakov and V.K. Mitrjushkin and M. Müller-Presssker. Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.), 30:587, 1993. 249 …(truncated)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Bennett, Donald L.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1996
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9607341
arXiv
hep-ph/9607341
OpenAlex
W1717821631
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ipsen
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Keywords
gauge coupling, fine-tuning, nonlocal interactions, lattice gauge theory, phase transitions, fermion generations, Standard Model gauge group, Planck scale, reparametrization invariance, U(1) gauge coupling, constants of nature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review