PreprintCited by 3,275Quantum many-body systemsBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsTheoretical and Computational Physics

Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory

Open access
Calabrese, Pasquale, Cardy, John·2004·arXiv

Abstract

We carry out a systematic study of entanglement entropy in relativistic quantum field theory. This is defined as the von Neumann entropy S_A=-Tr rho_A log rho_A corresponding to the reduced density matrix rho_A of a subsystem A. For the case of a 1+1-dimensional critical system, whose continuum limit is a conformal field theory with central charge c, we re-derive the result S_A\sim(c/3) log(l) of Holzhey et al. when A is a finite interval of length l in an infinite system, and extend it to many other cases: finite systems,finite temperatures, and when A consists of an arbitrary number of disjoint intervals. For such a system away from its critical point, when the correlation length ξis large but finite, we show that S_A\sim{\cal A}(c/6)\logξ, where \cal A is the number of boundary points of A. These results are verified for a free massive field theory, which is also used to confirm a scaling ansatz for the case of finite-size off-critical systems, and for integrable lattice models, such as the Ising and XXZ models, which are solvable by corner transfer matrix methods. Finally the free-field results are extended to higher dimensions, and used to motivate a scaling form for the singular part of the entanglement entropy near a quantum phase transition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0405152

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The argument is similar in spirit to Cardy and Calabrese's derivation of entanglement entropy in CFT from the conformal Ward identity, but modified in the presence of gravity.

    “This is similar in spirit to Cardy and Calabrese's derivation of entanglement entropy in CFT from the conformal Ward identity [52], but the argument is modified in the presence of gravity.”

    From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

  • The Ward identity in the CFT on the replica manifold relates the derivative of the entropy to the stress tensor.

    “The Ward identity in the CFT on the replica manifold relates the derivative of the entropy to the stress tensor [52,67].”

    From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bennett C H, Bernstein H J, Popescu S and Schumacher B, Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations, 1996 Phys. Rev. A 53 2046 [quant-ph/9511030] · arXiv
  2. Osborne T J and Nielsen M A, Entanglement in a simple quantum phase transition, 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 32110 [quant-ph/0202162] · arXiv
  3. Barnum H, Knill E, Ortiz G, Somma R and Viola L, A subsystem-independent generalization of entanglement, 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 107902 [quant-ph/0305023] · arXiv
  4. Verstraete F, Martin-Delgado M A and Cirac J I, Diverging entanglement length in gapped quantum spin systems, 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 087201 [quant-ph/0311087] · arXiv
  5. Latorre J I, Rico E and Vidal G, Ground state entanglement in quantum spin chains, 2004 Quant. Inf. Comput. 4 048 [quant-ph/0304098] · arXiv
  6. Latorre J I, Lutken C A, Rico E and Vidal G, Fine-grained entanglement loss along renormalization group flows, 2004 Preprint quant-ph/0404120 · arXiv
  7. Jin B-Q and Korepin V E, Quantum spin chain, Toeplitz determinants and Fisher-Hartwig conjecture, 2004 J. Stat. Phys. 116 79 [quant-ph/0304108] · arXiv
  8. Lambert N, Emary C and Brandes T, Entanglement and the phase transition in single mode super-radiance, 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 073602 [quant-ph/0309027] · arXiv
  9. Casini H and Huerta M, A finite entanglement entropy and the c-theorem, 2004 Preprint hep-th/0405111 · arXiv
  10. Holzhey C, Larsen F and Wilczek F, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, 1994 Nucl. Phys. B 424 44 [hep-th/9403108] · arXiv
  11. Srednicki M, Entropy and area, 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 666 [hep-th/9303048] · arXiv
  12. Korepin V E, Universality of entropy scaling in 1D gap-less models, 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 096402 [cond-mat/0311056] · arXiv
  13. Nishino T, Density matrix renormalization group method for 2D classical models, 1995 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 74 3598 [cond-mat/9508111] · arXiv
  14. Nishino T and Okunishi K, Density matrix and renormalization for classical lattice models, 1997 Strongly Correlated Magnetic and Superconducting Systems (Lecture Notes in Physics vol 478) (Berlin: Springer) p 167 [cond-mat/9610107] · arXiv
  15. Peschel I, Kaulke M and Legeza O, Density-matrix spectra for integrable models, 1999 Ann. Phys. Lpz. 8 153 [cond-mat/9810174] · arXiv
  16. Watson G N, 1944 A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  17. Sneddon I N, On some infinite series involving the zeros of Bessel functions of the first kind, 1960 Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 4 144

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2004
Volume
2004
Issue
06
Pages
P06002-P06002
ISSN
1742-5468 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069840277
Cited by
3,275
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 169 · 2025: 260 · 2024: 232 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 263 · 2021: 234 · 2020: 235 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 154 · 2017: 181 · 2016: 194 · 2015: 165 · 2014: 164 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 107
FWCI
18.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GR/R83712/01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
entanglement entropy, relativistic quantum field theory, von Neumann entropy, reduced density matrix, conformal field theory, central charge, finite temperature, disjoint intervals, integrable lattice models, Ising model, XXZ model, corner transfer matrix, quantum phase transitions, scaling ansatz, correlation length

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review