The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape
Open accessAbstract
Theories of the cosmological constant fall into two classes, those in which the vacuum energy is fixed by the fundamental theory and those in which it is adjustable in some way. For each class we discuss key challenges. The string theory landscape is an example of an adjustment mechanism. We discuss the status of this idea, and future directions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many mechanisms aimed at selecting a small value for r_L can only explain why the cosmological constant vanishes in an empty universe.
“Polchinski (2006) notes that many of the mechanisms aimed at selecting a small value for r L -the Hawking-Hartle wavefunction, the de Sitter entropy and the Coleman-de Luccia amplitude for tunneling -can only explain why the cosmological constant vanishes in an empty universe.”
From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Polchinski (2006)
In §1.2 (pp. 10–11), Polchinski names the Hartle–Hawking wavefunction, de Sitter entropy, and Coleman–de Luccia tunneling, then argues that these gravitational mechanisms can act on the cosmological constant only when matter is essentially absent. But he says they favor the smallest positive value, not that they explain why the cosmological constant vanishes exactly; he also states that zero cannot be a special value (p. 10). (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The cosmological constant problem
Weinberg, S. (1989) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.1 · Cited by 7,341 · see citing works
Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay
Coleman, S., & De Luccia, F. (1980) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.3305 · Cited by 1,537 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It seems clear that the cosmological constant cannot vary continuously.”
BackgroundLoss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity
Giddings, S. B., & Strominger, A. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90109-5 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Dimensionless constants, cosmology, and other dark matters
Tegmark, M., Aguirre, A., Rees, M. J., & Wilczek, F. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.023505 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Why Is the Cosmic Microwave Background Fluctuation Level 10<sup>−5</sup>?
Tegmark, M., & Rees, M. J. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305673 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- [2][2] S. M. Carroll, The cosmological constant, Living Rev. Rel. 4 (2001) 1. URL http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2001-1 . [arXiv:astroph/0004075]. -
- [3][3] T. Padmanabhan, Cosmological constant: The weight of the vacuum, Phys. Rept. 380 (2003) 235 [arXiv:hep-th/0212290]. - · arXiv
- [4][4] S. Nobbenhuis, Categorizing different approaches to the cosmological constant problem, arXiv:gr-qc/0411093. - · arXiv
- [8][8] J. Bagger et al. [American Linear Collider Working Group], The case for a 500-GeV e+ e- linear collider arXiv:hep-ex/0007022. - · arXiv
- [9][9] S. R. Beane, On the importance of testing gravity at distances less than 1-cm, Gen. Rel. Grav. 29 (1997) 945 [arXiv:hep-ph/9702419]. - · arXiv
- [10][10] R. Sundrum, Towards an effective particle-string resolution of the cosmological constant problem, JHEP 9907 (1999) 001 [arXiv:hepph/9708329]. -
- [11][11] E. Rutherford, The scattering of the alpha and beta rays and the structure of the atom, Proc. Manchester Lit. and Phil. Soc. IV, 55 (1911) 18. -
- [12][12] R. Sundrum, Fat Euclidean gravity with small cosmological constant, Nucl. Phys. B 690 (2004) 302 [arXiv:hep-th/0310251]. - · arXiv
- [13][13] N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali and G. Gabadadze, Nonlocal modification of gravity and the cosmological constant problem, arXiv:hep-th/0209227. - · arXiv
- [16][16] D. E. Kaplan and R. Sundrum, A symmetry for the cosmological constant, arXiv:hep-th/0505265. - · arXiv
- [21][21] T. Banks, M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Irrational axions as a solution of the strong CP problem in an eternal universe, Phys. Lett. B 273 , 105 (1991) [arXiv:hep-th/9109040]. - · arXiv
- [23][23] A. D. Linde, Inflation And Quantum Cosmology, in 'Three hundred years of gravitation,' eds. S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge (1987). -
- [29][29] A. D. Linde, 'Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology,' Chur, Switzerland: Harwood (1990) arXiv:hep-th/0503203. - · arXiv
- [30][30] L. Smolin, The Fate of black hole singularities and the parameters of the standard models of particle physics and cosmology, arXiv:gr-qc/9404011. - · arXiv
- [31][31] R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, Quantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant, JHEP 0006 , 006 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0004134]. - · arXiv
- [32][32] J. L. Feng, J. March-Russell, S. Sethi and F. Wilczek, Saltatory relaxation of the cosmological constant, Nucl. Phys. B 602 , 307 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0005276]. - · arXiv
- [33][33] E. Silverstein, (A)dS backgrounds from asymmetric orientifolds, arXiv:hep-th/0106209. - · arXiv
- [34][34] S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and S. P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 , 046005 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0301240]. - · arXiv
- [35][35] L. Susskind, The anthropic landscape of string theory, arXiv:hepth/0302219. -
- [36][36] N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, N. Kaloper and R. Sundrum, A small cosmological constant from a large extra dimension, Phys. Lett. B 480 , 193 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0001197]. - · arXiv
- [37][37] S. Kachru, M. B. Schulz and E. Silverstein, Self-tuning flat domain walls in 5d gravity and string theory, Phys. Rev. D 62 , 045021 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0001206]. - · arXiv
- [45][45] V. A. Rubakov, Relaxation of the cosmological constant at inflation?, Phys. Rev. D 61 , 061501 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9911305]. - · arXiv
- [50][50] A. Vilenkin, Anthropic predictions: The case of the cosmological constant, arXiv:astro-ph/0407586. - · arXiv
- [51][51] S. Weinberg, Living in the multiverse, arXiv:hep-th/0511037. - · arXiv
- [52][52] D. Schwartz-Perlov and A. Vilenkin, Probabilities in the BoussoPolchinski multiverse, arXiv:hep-th/0601162; P. Steinhardt, private communication. - · arXiv
- [53][53] A. R. Frey, M. Lippert and B. Williams, The fall of stringy de Sitter, Phys. Rev. D 68 , 046008 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0305018]. - · arXiv
- [54][54] A. Saltman and E. Silverstein, A new handle on de Sitter compactifications, JHEP 0601 , 139 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0411271]. - · arXiv
- [55][55] F. Denef and M. R. Douglas, Computational complexity of the landscape. I, arXiv:hep-th/0602072. - · arXiv
- [56][56] T. Banks, M. Dine and E. Gorbatov, Is there a string theory landscape? JHEP 0408 , 058 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0309170]. - · arXiv
- [57][57] T. Banks, Landskepticism or why effective potentials don't count string models, arXiv:hep-th/0412129. - · arXiv
- [58][58] E. Silverstein, AdS and dS entropy from string junctions or the function of junction conjunctions, arXiv:hep-th/0308175. - · arXiv
- [59][59] M. R. Douglas, Basic results in vacuum statistics, Comptes Rendus Physique 5 , 965 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0409207]. - · arXiv
- [60][60] T. Banks and W. Fischler, M-theory observables for cosmological spacetimes, arXiv:hep-th/0102077; T. Banks, Some thoughts on the quantum theory of stable de Sitter space, arXiv:hep-th/0503066. - · arXiv
- [61][61] J. P. Conlon, The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation arXiv:hepth/0602233. -
- [62][62] F. Gmeiner, R. Blumenhagen, G. Honecker, D. Lust and T. Weigand, One in a billion: MSSM-like D-brane statistics, JHEP 0601 , 004 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0510170]. - · arXiv
- [63][63] M. Tegmark and M. J. Rees, Why is the CMB fluctuation level 10 -5 ? Astrophys. J. 499 , 526 (1998) [arXiv:astro-ph/9709058]. - · arXiv
- [64][64] M. L. Graesser, S. D. H. Hsu, A. Jenkins and M. B. Wise, Anthropic distribution for cosmological constant and primordial density perturbations, Phys. Lett. B 600 , 15 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0407174]. - · arXiv
- [65][65] B. Feldstein, L. J. Hall and T. Watari, Density perturbations and the cosmological constant from inflationary landscapes, Phys. Rev. D 72 , 123506 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0506235]. - · arXiv
- [66][66] J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, Anthropic prediction for Lambda and the Q catastrophe, arXiv:hep-th/0508005. - · arXiv
- [68][68] A. Vilenkin, Probabilities in the landscape, arXiv:hep-th/0602264. - · arXiv
- [69][69] N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and S. Kachru, Predictive landscapes and new physics at a TeV, arXiv:hep-th/0501082. - · arXiv
- [70][70] M. Dine, D. O'Neil and Z. Sun, Branches of the landscape, JHEP 0507 , 014 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0501214]. - · arXiv
- [71][71] N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC, JHEP 0506 , 073 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0405159]. - · arXiv
- [72][72] P. J. Fox et al. , Supersplit supersymmetry, arXiv:hep-th/0503249. - · arXiv
- [73][73] A. Aguirre and M. Tegmark, Multiple universes, cosmic coincidences, and other dark matters, JCAP 0501 , 003 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0409072]. - · arXiv
- [74][74] A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde and A. Mezhlumian, From the Big Bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe, Phys. Rev. D 49 , 1783 (1994) [arXiv:gr-qc/9306035]. - · arXiv
- [75][75] A. H. Guth, Inflation and eternal inflation, Phys. Rept. 333 , 555 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/0002156]. - · arXiv
- [76][76] B. Freivogel and L. Susskind, A framework for the landscape, Phys. Rev. D 70 , 126007 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0408133]. - · arXiv
- [77][77] R. Bousso and B. Freivogel, Asymptotic states of the bounce geometry, arXiv:hep-th/0511084. - · arXiv
- [80][80] K. Intriligator, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, Dynamical SUSY breaking in meta-stable vacua, arXiv:hep-th/0602239. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life
Barnes, L. A. (2012) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as12015 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
- Authors
- Polchinski, J.
- Corresponding author
- Polchinski, Joseph
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 216-236
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/0603249
- OpenAlex
- W2158945977
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Talk given at
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- cosmological constant, string landscape, vacuum energy, string theory, multiverse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review