The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Black hole thermodynamics and information loss in two dimensions
Open accessAbstract
Black hole evaporation is investigated in a (1+1)-dimensional model of quantum gravity. Quantum corrections to the black hole entropy are computed, and the fine-grained entropy of the Hawking radiation is studied. A generalized second law of thermodynamics is formulated, and shown to be valid under suitable conditions. It is also shown that, in this model, a black hole can consume an arbitrarily large amount of information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The entropy growth rate in (5.4) is precisely twice the rate obtained in [32] for the entanglement entropy of radiation emitted to one side.
“we note that the entropy growth rate in (5.4) is precisely twice the rate that was obtained in [32] for the entanglement entropy of radiation emitted to one side.”
From Page curve for an evaporating black hole (2020) · cites this paper as [32]
The von Neumann entropy of a coherent state built on the vacuum state of inertial observers at past null infinity is identical to the von Neumann entropy of the vacuum state.
“As shown in [32], the von Neumann entropy of such a state is identical to the von Neumann entropy of the vacuum state.”
From Page curve for an evaporating black hole (2020) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3]3. W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D25, 942 (1982); W. H. Zurek and K. S. Thorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 2171; K. S. Thorne, W. H. Zurek, and R. H. Price, in Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm, edited by K. S. Thorne, R. H. Price, and D. A. MacDonald (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1986), p. 280; R. M. Wald, in Black Hole Physics, edited by V. De Sabbata and Zhenjiu Zhang (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992), p. 55; I. D. Novikov and V. P. Frolov, Physics of Black Holes (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989) and references therein.
- [8]8. C. G. Callan, S. B. Giddings, J. A. Harvey and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) R1005; For reviews see J. A. Harvey and A. Strominger, Quantum Aspects of Black Holes, in the proceedings of the 1992 TASI Summer School in Boulder, Colorado (World Scientific, 1993), and S. B. Giddings, Toy Models for 86 Black Hole Evaporation, in the proceedings of the International Workshop of The- oretical Physics, 6th Session, June 1992, Erice, Italy (World Scientific, 1993).
- [13]13. C. Holzhey, Princeton University Ph.D. Thesis (1993), unpublished.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)013 · Cited by 910
The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry
Almheiri, A., Mahajan, R., Maldacena, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)149 · Cited by 898
Page curve for an evaporating black hole
Gautason, F. F., Schneiderbauer, L., Sybesma, W., & Thorlacius, L. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)091 · Cited by 187
The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem
Wall, A. C. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/16/165003 · Cited by 106
Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole
Goto, K., Hartman, T., & Tajdini, A. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)289 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiola, T. M., Preskill, J., Strominger, A., & Trivedi, S. P.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3987-4014
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/9403137
- OpenAlex
- W2092840968
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (FG0392ER40701)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
- Keywords
- black hole thermodynamics, black hole information loss, black hole evaporation, black hole entropy, quantum corrections, Hawking radiation, generalized second law of thermodynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
