The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Constraints on Low-Dimensional String Compactifications
Abstract
We study the restrictions imposed by cancellation of the tadpoles for two, three, and four-form gauge fields in string theory, M-theory and F-theory compactified to two, three and four dimensions, respectively. For a large class of supersymmetric vacua, turning on a sufficient number of strings, membranes and three-branes, respectively, can cancel the tadpoles, and preserve supersymmetry. However, there are cases where the tadpole cannot be removed in this way, either because the tadpole is fractional, or because of its sign. For M-theory and F-theory compactifications, we also explore the relation of the membranes and three-branes to the nonperturbative space-time superpotential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In principle, the variation of the warp factor could be much larger because the D3-brane tadpole found in F-theory on a Calabi-Yau 4-fold [40, 41], which determines the maximum amount of background flux, can be as large as O (10 4 ) in known examples.”
From Gravitational memory and compact extra dimensions (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- C. Vafa, "Evidence For F Theory", hep-th/9602022. · arXiv
- K. Becker and M. Becker, "M-Theory on Eight-Manifolds", hep-th/9605053. · arXiv
- A. A. Tseytlin, "Self-Duality of Born-Infeld Action and Dirichlet 3-Brane of Type IIB Superstring Theory", hep-th/9602064. · arXiv
- A. Sen, "Duality and Orbifolds", hep-th/9604070. · arXiv
- D. Morrison and C. Vafa, "Compactifications of F Theory on Calabi-Yau Threefolds. I,II", hep-th/9602114, hep-th/9603161. · arXiv
- R. Bott and L. W. Tu, Differential Forms In Algebraic Topology (Springer-Verlag, 1982).
- M. Green, J. Harvey and G. Moore, "I-Brane Inflow and Anomalous Couplings on D-branes", hep-th/9605033. · arXiv
- M. Douglas and M. Li, "D-brane Realization of Super Yang-Mills Theory in Four- Dimensions", hep-th/9604041. · arXiv
- M.J. Duff, R. Minasian and E. Witten, "Evidence for Heterotic/Heterotic Duality", hep-th/9601036. · arXiv
- P. Candelas and A. Font, "Duality Between the Webs of Heterotic and Type II Vacua", hep-th/9603170. · arXiv
- E. Witten, "Nonperturbative Superpotentials in String Theory", hep-th/9604030. · arXiv
- E. Witten, "Phase Transitions In M-Theory And F-Theory," hep-th/9603150. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gravitational memory and compact extra dimensions
Ferko, C., Satishchandran, G., & Sethi, S. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.024072 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sethi, S., Vafa, C., & Witten, E.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1996
- arXiv
- hep-th/9606122
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review