Anticommuting Integrals and Fermionic Field Theories for Two-Dimensional Ising Models
Open accessAbstract
We review the applications of the integral over anticommuting Grassmann variables (nonquantum fermionic fields) to the analytic solutions and the field-theoretical formulations for the 2D Ising models. The 2D Ising model partition function $Q$ is presentable as the fermionic Gaussian integral. The use of the spin-polynomial interpretation of the 2D Ising problem is stressed, in particular. Starting with the spin-polynomial interpretation of the local Boltzmann weights, the Gaussian integral for $Q$ appears in the universal form for a variety of lattices, including the standard rectangular, triangular, and hexagonal lattices, and with the minimal number of fermionic variables (two per site). The analytic solutions for the correspondent 2D Ising models then follow by passing to the momentum space on a lattice. The symmetries and the question on the location of critical point have an interesting interpretation within this spin-polynomial formulation of the problem. From the exact lattice theory we then pass to the continuum-limit field-theoretical interpretation of the 2D Ising models. The continuum theory captures all relevant features of the original models near $T_c$. The continuum limit corresponds to the low-momentum sector of the exact theory responsible for the critical-point singularities and the large-distance behaviour of correlations. The resulting field theory is the massive two-component Majorana theory, with mass vanishing at $T_c$. By doubling of fermions in the Majorana representation, we obtain as well the 2D Dirac field theory of charged fermions for 2D Ising models. The differences between particular 2D Ising lattices are merely adsorbed, in the field-theoretical formulation, in the definition of the effective mass.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [4][4] C. Itzykson and J.M. Drouffe, Statistical Field Theory (Cambridge, Mass., Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989). -
- [10][10] P.A.M. Dirac, Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford, 1934).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Classical sequential growth dynamics for causal sets
Rideout, D. P., & Sorkin, R. D. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.024002 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
- Authors
- Plechko, V. N.
- Affiliations
- Bogoliubov Lab Dubna
- Corresponding author
- Plechko, V. N.
- ORCID
- Plechko, V. N.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 443-450
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/9607053
- OpenAlex
- W2963596652
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Presented at
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
- Keywords
- two-dimensional Ising model, Grassmann variables, exact partition function, critical points, continuum limit, lattice spin models, critical exponents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review