M Theory As A Matrix Model: A Conjecture
Open accessAbstract
We suggest and motivate a precise equivalence between uncompactified eleven dimensional M-theory and the N = infinity limit of the supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics describing D0-branes. The evidence for the conjecture consists of several correspondences between the two theories. As a consequence of supersymmetry the simple matrix model is rich enough to describe the properties of the entire Fock space of massless well separated particles of the supergravity theory. In one particular kinematic situation the leading large distance interaction of these particles is exactly described by supergravity . The model appears to be a nonperturbative realization of the holographic principle. The membrane states required by M-theory are contained as excitations of the matrix model. The membrane world volume is a noncommutative geometry embedded in a noncommutative spacetime.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is evidence from matrix models that compute scattering amplitudes in special vacua.
“There is also evidence from matrix models that compute scattering amplitudes in special vacua [57].”
From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
Section 6 (p. 15) computes a scattering amplitude from the matrix model in a special kinematic situation with no longitudinal momentum exchange. The paper offers this as evidence for the model, but it does not describe the calculation as taking place in “special vacua”; the restriction is on the scattering kinematics, not the vacuum. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredString theory provides a great deal of very non-trivial evidence for the central dogma.
“Though we said that the 'central dogma' is an unproven assumption, there is a great deal of very non-trivial evidence from string theory.”
From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
The Introduction (p. 2) describes evidence for the authors’ conjectured M-theory matrix model, and the discussion of the Holographic Principle (p. 5) describes evidence for a particular predicted behavior. Neither passage identifies the citing document’s “central dogma” or says that string theory provides evidence for it. Searches for the phrase and for black-hole information or unitarity did not establish that connection in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- [1][1] M.J. Duff, P. Howe, T. Inami, K.S. Stelle, 'Superstrings in D=10 from supermembranes in D=11', Phys. Lett. B191 (1987) 70; M.J. Duff, J. X. Lu, 'Duality rotations in membrane theory', Nucl. Phys. B347 (1990) 394 ; M.J. Duff, R. Minasian, James T. Liu, 'Eleven-dimensional origin of string/string duality: a one-loop test', Nucl. Phys. B452 (1995) 261 ; C. Hull and P. K. Townsend, 'Unity of superstring dualities', Nucl. Phys. B438 (1995) 109, hep-th/9410167 ; P. K. Townsend, 'The Eleven-Dimensional Supermembrane Revisited' Phys. Lett. B350 (1995) 184 hep-th/9501068 ; - 'String-membrane duality in seven dimensions', Phys. Lett. 354B (1995) 247, hepth/9504095 ; C. Hull and P. K. Townsend, 'Enhanced gauge symmetries in superstring theories', Nucl. Phys. B451 (1995) 525, hep-th/9505073; - E. Witten 'String Theory Dynamics in Various Dimensions', Nucl.Phys. B443 (1995) 85 hep-th/9503124. - · arXiv
- [2][2] J.Polchinski, 'Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges', Phys.Rev.Lett.75 - (1995) 4724; for a review see J.Polchinski, S.Chaudhuri, and C.V. Johnson, 'Notes on D-Branes', 4. ITP preprint NSF-ITP-96-003, hep-th/9602052 . - · arXiv
- [4][4] E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and P.K. Townsend Phys.Lett. B189 (1987) 75; Ann. Phys. (NY) 185 (1988) 330; 7. P.K. Townsend in 'Superstring '88', proc.of the Trieste Spring School, eds M.B. Green, M.T. Grisaru, R. Iengo and A. Strominger ( World Scient., 1989 ); M.J. Duff, Class. Quantum Grav. 5 (1988) 189 -
- [7][7] G.'t Hooft, 'Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity' Utrecht preprint THU93/26 gr-qc/9310026; 11. L.Susskind, 'The World as a Hologram' J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377, hepth/940989. - · arXiv
- [8][8] S. H. Shenker, 'Another Length Scale in String Theory?', hep-th/9509132. - · arXiv
- [9][9] U.H. Danielsson, G. Ferretti and B. Sundborg,'D-particle Dynamics and Bound States', hep-th/9603081; D. Kabat and P. Pouliot,'A Comment on Zero-Brane Quantum Mechanics', hepth/9603127; M.R. Douglas, D. Kabat, P. Pouliot and S. Shenker, 'D-Branes and Short Distance in String Theory', hep-th/9608024 . - · arXiv
- [12][12] C.B. Thorn, Proceedings of Sakharov Conf. on Physics Moscow (1991) 447-454, hepth/9405069. -
- [13][13] J. D. Bekenstein, Phys.Rev. D 49 (1994), 6606; G. 't Hooft in ref [7]. -
- [14][14] T. Banks and L.Susskind, 'Brane - Antibrane Forces', hep-th/9511194. - · arXiv
- [16][16] A.A. Tseytlin,'On SO (32) Heterotic - type I Superststring Duality in Ten Dimensions' Imperial /TP/95-96/6 hep-th/9510173; 'Heterotic - Type I Superstring Duality and Low -Energy Effective Actions,' Imperial /TP/95-96/16 hep-th/9512081. - · arXiv
- [20][20] M. Berkooz and M. R. Douglas, ' Five-branes in M(atrix) Theory,' hep-th/9610236. - · arXiv
- [21][21] B.de Wit, V. Marquard and H. Nicolai 'Area Preserving Diffeomorphisms and Supermembrane Lorentz Invariance' Commun. Math. Phys. 128, 39 (1990). -
- [22][22] W. Taylor, 'D-brane field theory on compact spaces,' hep-th/9611042 - · arXiv
- [24][24] S. de Alwis, 'A Note on Brane Tension and M Theory,' hep-th/9607011. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.035002 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
- Authors
- Banks, T., Fischler, W., Shenker, S. H., & Susskind, L.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5112-5128
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/9610043
- OpenAlex
- W2117709364
- Cited by
- 2,748
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 195.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DEFG0296ER40959)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Keywords
- M-theory, matrix models, D0-branes, eleven-dimensional supergravity, holographic principle, noncommutative geometry, noncommutative spacetime, membrane state, Fock space
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
