PreprintCited by 132Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Toric Geometry and Enhanced Gauge Symmetry of F-Theory/Heterotic Vacua

Open access
Candelas, Philip, Perevalov, Eugene, Rajesh, Govindan·1997·arXiv

Abstract

We study F-theory compactified on elliptic Calabi-Yau threefolds that are realised as hypersurfaces in toric varieties. The enhanced gauge group as well as the number of massless tensor multiplets has a very simple description in terms of toric geometry. We find a large number of examples where the gauge group is not a subgroup of E8xE8, but rather, is much bigger (with rank as high as 296). The largest of these groups is the group recently found by Aspinwall and Gross. Our algorithm can also be applied to elliptic fourfolds, for which the groups can become extremely large indeed (with rank as high as 121328). We present the gauge content for two of the fourfolds recently studied by Klemm et al.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9704097

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. S. Kachru and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B450 (1995) 69, hep-th/9505105. · arXiv
  2. S. Ferrara, J. Harvey, A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. 361B (1995) 59, hep-th/9505162. · arXiv
  3. A. Klemm, W. Lerche and P. Mayr, Phys .Lett. 357B (1995) 113, hep-th/9506112. · arXiv
  4. C. Vafa and E. Witten, hep-th/9507050. · arXiv
  5. G. Gómez and E. López, Phys. Lett. 356B (1995) 487, hep-th/9506024. · arXiv
  6. M. Billó et. al. Class. Quant. Grav. 13 (1996) 831, hep-th/9506075. · arXiv
  7. I. Antoniadis, E. Gava, K. S. Narain and T. R. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B455 (1995) 109, hep-th/9507115. · arXiv
  8. G. Lopes Cardoso, D. Lust and T. Mohaupt, Nucl. Phys. B455 (1995) 131, hep-th/9507113. · arXiv
  9. G. Curio, Phys. Lett. 368B (1996) 78, hep-th/9509146. · arXiv
  10. V. Kaplunovsky, J. Louis and S. Theisen, Phys. Lett. 357B (1995) 71, hep-th/9506110. · arXiv
  11. S. Kachru, A. Klemm, W. Lerche, P. Mayr and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B459 (1996) 537, hep-th/9508155. · arXiv
  12. P. Candelas, X. de la Ossa and S. Katz, Nucl. Phys. B450 (1995) 267, hep-th/9412117. · arXiv
  13. P. Candelas and A. Font, hep-th/9603170. · arXiv
  14. P. Candelas, E. Perevalov and G. Rajesh, hep-th/9606133. · arXiv
  15. P. Candelas, E. Perevalov and G. Rajesh, hep-th/9703148. · arXiv
  16. A. Avram, M. Kreuzer, M. Mandelberg and H. Skarke, hep-th/9610154. · arXiv
  17. D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B473 (1996) 74, hep-th/9602114. · arXiv
  18. D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B476 (1996) 437, hep-th/9603161. · arXiv
  19. M. Bershadsky et al., hep-th/9605200. · arXiv
  20. A. Klemm, B. Lian, S.-S. Roan and S.-T. Yau, hep-th/9701023. · arXiv
  21. M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, hep-th/9701175. · arXiv
  22. W. Fulton, Introduction to Toric Varieties, Princeton University Press, 1993.
  23. P. S. Aspinwall, hep-th/9612108. · arXiv
  24. M. Bershadsky and A. Johansen, hep-th/9610111. · arXiv
  25. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B460 (1996) 541, hep-th/9511030. · arXiv
  26. A. Klemm and R. Schimmrigk, Nucl. Phys. B411 (1994) 559, hep-th/9204060. · arXiv
  27. M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, Nucl. Phys. B388 (1992) 113, hep-th/9205004. · arXiv
  28. H. Skarke, alg-geom/9603007. · arXiv
  29. K. Mohri, hep-th/9701147. · arXiv
  30. G. Curio and D. Lüst, hep-th/9703007. · arXiv
  31. M. Bershadsky, A. Johansen, T. Pantev and V. Sadov, hep-th/9701165. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Candelas, P., Perevalov, E., & Rajesh, G.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
  • Candelas, Philip
  • Perevalov, Eugene
  • Rajesh, Govindan
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1997
Volume
507
Issue
1-2
Pages
445-474
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050562072
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9511632)
  • Welch Foundation (PHY-9511632)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
F-theory, heterotic string theory, enhanced gauge symmetry, toric geometry, elliptic Calabi-Yau threefolds, gauge group rank

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review