Holography, Cosmology and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Open accessAbstract
We propose that in time dependent backgrounds the holographic principle should be replaced by the generalized second law of thermodynamics. For isotropic open and flat universes with a fixed equation of state, the generalized second law agrees with the cosmological holographic principle proposed by Fischler and Susskind. However, in more complicated spacetimes the two proposals disagree. A modified form of the holographic bound that applies to a post-inflationary universe follows from the generalized second law. However, in a spatially closed universe, or inside a black hole event horizon, there is no simple relationship that connects the area of a region to the maximum entropy it can contain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other prescriptions can be used for sufficiently small surfaces in a wide class of cosmological solutions.
“while other prescriptions [12,13,14,15,16] can be used for sufficiently small surfaces in a wide class of cosmological solutions.”
From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [12]
The Conclusions (p. 11) propose a modified holographic bound for regions smaller than the Hubble volume, supporting the point about sufficiently small regions. But the proposal is specifically for the post-inflationary universe; the same section says a useful holographic bound cannot be deduced for closed universes. The claim’s ‘wide class of cosmological solutions’ is therefore broader than this paper establishes. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOther proposals for cosmological entropy bounds are based on defining a limited spatial region to which Bekenstein's bound can be applied.
“Other proposals for cosmological entropy bounds [12,13,14,15,16] are based on the idea of defining a limited spatial region to which Bekenstein's bound can be JHEP07(1999)004 applied.”
From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [1][1] G. 't Hooft, 'Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity,' gr-qc/9310026. - · arXiv
- [2][2] L. Susskind, 'The World as a Hologram,' J. Math. Phys. 36 , 6377 (1995), hep-th/9409089. - · arXiv
- [5][5] W. Fischler and L. Susskind, 'Holography and Cosmology,' hep-th/9806039. - · arXiv
- [7][7] D. Bak and S.-J. Rey, 'Holographic Principle and String Cosmology,' hep-th/9811008; A.K. Biswas, J. Maharana, and R.K. Pradhan, 'The Holography Hypothesis and Pre-Big Bang Cosmology,' hep-th/9811051; R. Dawid, 'A speculative remark on holography,' hep-th/9811243; M. Maggiore and A. Riotto, 'D-branes and Cosmology,' hep-th/9811089. - · arXiv
- [8][8] S. K. Rama and T. Sarkar, 'Holographic Principle during Inflation and a Lower Bound on Density Fluctuations,' hep-th/9812043. - · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A covariant entropy conjecture
Bousso, R. (1999) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
- Authors
- Easther, R., & Lowe, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 4967-4970
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/9902088
- OpenAlex
- W2060766232
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- holographic principle, generalized second law of thermodynamics, time-dependent backgrounds, open universe, flat universe, equation of state, black hole thermodynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
