Cosmic Holography
Open accessAbstract
A new version of holographic principle for cosmology is proposed, which dictates that particle entropy within `cosmological apparent horizon' should not exceed gravitational entropy associated with the apparent horizon. It is shown that, in the Friedman-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology, the open Universe as well as a restricted class of flat cases are compatible with the principle, whereas closed Universe is not. It is also found that inflationary Universe after the big-bang is incompatible with the cosmic holography.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other prescriptions can be used for sufficiently small surfaces in a wide class of cosmological solutions.
“while other prescriptions [12,13,14,15,16] can be used for sufficiently small surfaces in a wide class of cosmological solutions.”
From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [14]
In “Cosmic Holography Tested Against FRW Unverse” (page unavailable), the paper discusses an apparent-horizon prescription and reports compatibility with open universes and restricted classes of flat universes. It does not establish that other prescriptions work for sufficiently small surfaces across a wide class of cosmological solutions; it also reports failures for closed universes and typical post-big-bang inflationary models. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe entropy in the spatial interior of the apparent horizon will not be bounded by its area in that region.
“The entropy in the spatial interior of the apparent horizon [14] will not be bounded by its area in this region.”
From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [14]
In “Cosmic Holography Tested Against FRW Unverse” (page unavailable), the paper reports that the entropy–area bound can be violated in closed-universe models. But it also finds the bound satisfied in open universes and some flat-universe cases. The unqualified claim that entropy inside the apparent horizon will not be bounded by its area overstates those findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOther proposals for cosmological entropy bounds are based on defining a limited spatial region to which Bekenstein's bound can be applied.
“Other proposals for cosmological entropy bounds [12,13,14,15,16] are based on the idea of defining a limited spatial region to which Bekenstein's bound can be JHEP07(1999)004 applied.”
From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [14]
The bound of ref. [14] cannot be applied to a flat universe with negative cosmological constant.
“As an example, we apply a corollary derived in sec.5.1 to understand why the bound of ref. [14] cannot be applied to a flat universe with negative cosmological constant [15].”
From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [14]
The section “Cosmic Holography Tested Against FRW Unverse” discusses bounds for flat universes with specified equations of state and difficulties in closed or inflationary universes, but does not address a flat universe with a negative cosmological constant. Searches for that condition and for a negative cosmological constant yielded no passage establishing that the bound cannot be applied to it. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- G. 't Hooft, Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity, in 'Salamfest' pp. 284-296 (World Scientific Co, Singapore, 1993).
- W. Fischler and L. Susskind, Holography and Cosmology, hep-th/9806039. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A covariant entropy conjecture
Bousso, R. (1999) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bak, D., & Rey, S.-J.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- ORCID
- Rey, Soo-Jong
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- L83-L89
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/9902173
- OpenAlex
- W2996927114
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- holographic principle, apparent horizon, gravitational entropy, FRW cosmology, open universe, closed universe, flat universe, cosmic inflation, Big Bang
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
