An Alternative to Compactification
Open accessAbstract
Conventional wisdom states that Newton's force law implies only four non-compact dimensions. We demonstrate that this is not necessarily true in the presence of a non-factorizable background geometry. The specific example we study is a single 3-brane embedded in five dimensions. We show that even without a gap in the Kaluza-Klein spectrum, four-dimensional Newtonian and general relativistic gravity is reproduced to more than adequate precision.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The universe is modelled in some models as the four-dimensional boundary of a five-dimensional space, placed at finite distance from the centre of the space, so that we live on a D-brane.
“the universe is modelled in some models as the four-dimensional boundary of a five-dimensional space, placed at finite distance from the centre of the space (so that we 'live on a D-brane': see e.g. Randall and Sundrum (1999: p. 4690)).”
From Noether's Theorems and Energy in General Relativity (2021) · cites this paper as Randall and Sundrum (1999: p. 4690)
The Introduction (p. 3) describes a four-dimensional 3-brane embedded in a five-dimensional bulk, supporting the broad description that we live on a brane. But the paper does not identify it as a D-brane or place it at a finite distance from the centre. It calls the branes boundaries only in a temporary finite-volume setup; the physical setup extends the fifth dimension to infinity (pp. 3, 6). (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [2][2] N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B429 (1998) 263, hepph/9803315; I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B436 (1998) 257, hep-ph/9804398. - · arXiv
- [3][3] G. Shiu and S. H. H. Tye, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 106007, hep-th/9805157. - · arXiv
- [4][4] R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 085009, hep-ph/9805471. - · arXiv
- [5][5] Z. Kakushadze and S. H. H. Tye, Brane World , hep-th/9809147. - · arXiv
- [6][6] S. Nussinov and R. Shrock, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 105002, hep-ph/9811323. - · arXiv
- [7][7] A. Donini and S. Rigolin, Anisotropic Type I String Compactification, Winding Modes and Large Extra Dimensions , hep-ph/9901443. - · arXiv
- [8][8] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension , hep-ph/9905221. - · arXiv
- [9][9] V. A. Rubakov and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B125 (1983) 139; M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B159 (1985) 22; M. Gogberashvili, Four Dimensionality in Non-compact Kaluza Klein Model , hep-ph/9904383. - · arXiv
- [11][11] M. Cvetic and H. H. Soleng, Phys. Rep. 282 (1997) 159, hep-th/9604090. - · arXiv
- [12][12] J. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231, hep-th/9711200; O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity , hep-th/9905111. - · arXiv
- [13][13] T. Damour, Gravitation and Experiment , gr-qc/9711061. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)013 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry
Almheiri, A., Mahajan, R., Maldacena, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)149 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Noether's Theorems and Energy in General Relativity
De Haro, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.17160 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Randall, L., & Sundrum, R.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4690-4693
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/9906064
- OpenAlex
- W2095721433
- Cited by
- 7,212
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 111 · 2025: 154 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 205 · 2022: 209 · 2021: 211 · 2020: 226 · 2019: 187 · 2018: 210 · 2017: 179 · 2016: 230 · 2015: 201 · 2014: 205 · 2013: 236 · 2012: 253
- FWCI
- 284.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- extra dimensions, Kaluza-Klein spectrum, 3-brane, five-dimensional gravity, Newtonian gravity, general relativity, compactification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
