CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 59Geometric and Algebraic TopologyAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry

6j symbols for U_q(sl_2) and non-Euclidean tetrahedra

Open access
Taylor, Yuka U., Woodward, Christopher T.·2003·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.math/0305113arXiv math/0305113
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We relate the semiclassical asymptotics of the 6j symbols for the representation theory of the quantized enveloping algebra U_q(sl_2) at q a primitive root of unity, or q positive real, to the geometry of non-Euclidean tetrahedra. The formulas are motivated by the geometry of conformal blocks in the Wess-Zumino-Witten model; they generalize formulas in the case q = 1 of Wigner, Ponzano and Regge, and Schulten and Gordon, proved by J. Roberts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.math/0305113

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quantum 6j-symbols are related to spherical tetrahedra rather than flat tetrahedra.

    “Correspondingly, the quantum 6j-symbols are related to spherical tetrahedra rather than flat tetrahedra [255].”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [255]

    The Introduction (p. 1) relates the semiclassical asymptotics of quantum 6j-symbols to spherical tetrahedra when q is a root of unity. The claim omits that condition: the paper also relates the symbols to hyperbolic tetrahedra for positive real q and discusses a Euclidean formula for q = 1 (p. 3). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]S. Agnihotri and C. Woodward. Eigenvalues of products of unitary matrices and quantum Schubert calculus. Math. Res. Lett., 5(6):817–836, 1998.
  2. [2]A. Y. Alekseev and A. Z. Malkin. The hyperbolic moduli space of flat connections and the isomorphism of symplectic multiplicity spaces. Duke Math. J., 93(3):575–595, 1998.
  3. [5]J. Barrett. Quantum gravity as topological quantum field theory. J. Math. Phys., 36(11):6161–6179, 1995.
  4. [7]P. Belkale. Local systems on P1−S for S a finite set. Compositio Math., 129(1):67–86, 2001.
  5. Poincaré series. Invent. Math., 122(2):359–402, 1995.
  6. University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995.
  7. [11]L.-C. Chen, M. E. H. Ismail, and P. Simeonov. Asymptotics of Racah coefficients and poly- nomials. J. Phys. A, 32(3):537–553, 1999.
  8. [12]G. Daskalopoulos and R. Wentworth. Local degeneration of the moduli space of vector bundles and factorization of rank two theta functions. I. Math. Ann., 297(3):417–466, 1993.
  9. [13]M. Finkelberg. An equivalence of fusion categories. Geom. Funct. Anal., 6(2):249–267, 1996.
  10. Math. Phys., 141(1):79–117, 1991.
  11. Riemann surfaces with marked points. Adv. Math., 96(1):38–102, 1992.
  12. [18]J. S. Geronimo, O. Bruno, and W. Van Assche. WKB and turning point theory for second- order difference equations. In Spectral methods for operators of mathematical physics, vol- ume 154 of Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., pages 101–138. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2004.
  13. [21]A. A. Kirillov, Jr. On an inner product in modular tensor categories. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 9(4):1135–1169, 1996.
  14. [22]A. N. Kirillov and N. Yu. Reshetikhin. Representations of the algebra Uq(sl(2)), q- orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links. In Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and groups (Luminy-Marseille, 1988), pages 285–339. World Sci. Publishing, Teaneck, NJ, 1989. http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0303013 http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0202212 · arXiv
  15. [26]J. Milnor. Collected papers. Vol. 1. Publish or Perish Inc., Houston, TX, 1994. Geometry.
  16. [28]D. S. Moak. The q-analogue of Stirling's formula. Rocky Mountain J. Math., 14(2):403–413, 1984.
  17. [29]Y. Mohanty. Hyperbolic polyhedra: volume and scissors congruence. PhD thesis, University of California at San Diego, 2002.
  18. [30]H. Murakami and J. Murakami. The colored Jones polynomials and the simplicial volume of a knot. Acta Math., 186(1):85–104, 2001.
  19. [36]K. Schulten and R. G. Gordon. Semiclassical approximations to 3j- and 6j-coefficients for quantum-mechanical coupling of angular momenta. J. Mathematical Phys., 16(10):1971– 1988, 1975.
  20. [37]C. Teleman and C. Woodward. Parabolic bundles, products of conjugacy classes and Gromov-Witten invariants. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 53(3):713–748, 2003.
  21. [38]A. Tsuchiya, K. Ueno, and Y. Yamada. Conformal field theory on universal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries. In Integrable systems in quantum field theory and statistical mechanics, volume 19 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 459–566. Academic Press, 1989.
  22. [39]V. G. Turaev and O. Ya. Viro. State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols. Topology, 31(4):865–902, 1992.
  23. [40]K. Ueno and M. Nishizawa. Quantum groups and zeta-functions. In Quantum groups (Karpacz, 1994), pages 115–126. PWN, Warsaw, 1995. hep-th/940814.
  24. [41]J. K. G. Watson. Asymptotic approximations for certain 6j and 9j symbols. J. Phys. A, 32(39):6901–6902, 1999.
  25. [42]E. P. Wigner.Group theory: And its application to the quantum mechanics of atomic spectra. Academic Press, New York, 1959.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, Y. U., & Woodward, C. T.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Yuka U.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2003
Volume
11
Issue
3-4
Pages
539-571
ISSN
1022-1824 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.math/0305113
arXiv
math/0305113
OpenAlex
W1992782693
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/
Locations
  • Selecta Mathematica (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Keywords
6j symbols, quantum sl2, quantized enveloping algebras, roots of unity, semiclassical asymptotics, quantum groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review