PreprintCited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Simplified and obvious expression of concurrence in Wootters' measure of entanglement of a pair of qubits

Wang, An Min·2002·arXiv

Abstract

We obtain a simplified and obvious expression of "concurrence" in Wootters' measure of entanglement of a pair of qubits having no more than two non-zero eigenvalues in terms of concurrences of eigenstates and their simple combinations. It not only simplifies the calculation of Wootters' measure of entanglement, but also reveals some its general and important features. Our conclusions are helpful to understand and use quantum entanglement further.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0208036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The polarization vector ξ and qutrit concurrence C obey the relation ξ^2 = 1 - C^2, obtained by Wang in 2000.

    “The derived expression for the polarization vector ξ ⃗ (4.16) can be compared with the general expression for the qutrit concurrence C (4.3) to show that they obey the relation ξ ⃗ 2 = 1 -C 2 obtained by Wang in 2000 [28].”

    From Entanglement of qutrits and ququarts (2010) · cites this paper as [28]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, A. M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2002
References
0
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review