The DOI matches its DataCite record.
The Free-Will Postulate in Quantum Mechanics
Open accessAbstract
The so-called "free will axiom" is an essential ingredient in many discussions concerning hidden variables in quantum mechanics. In this paper we argue that "free will" can be defined in different ways. The definition usually employed is clearly invalid in strictly deterministic theories. A different, more precise formulation is proposed here, defining a condition that may well be a more suitable one to impose on theoretical constructions and models. Our axiom, to be referred to as the `unconstrained initial state' condition, has consequences similar to "free will", but does not clash with determinism, and appears to lead to different conclusions concerning causality and locality in quantum mechanics. Models proposed earlier by this author fall in this category. Imposing our `unconstrained initial state' condition on a deterministic theory underlying Quantum Mechanics, appears to lead to a restricted free-will condition in the quantum system: an observer has the free will to modify the setting of a measuring device, but has no control over the phase of its wave function. The dismissal of the usual "free will" concept does not have any consequences for our views and interpretations of human activities in daily life, and the way our minds function, but it requires a more careful discussion on what, in practice, free will actually amounts to.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No theory that gives up NSD has yet been proposed that reproduces all the predictions of quantum mechanics.
“but, as yet, no such theory has been proposed that reproduces all the predictions of quantum mechanics.”
From A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
The Free Will section (pp. 3–4) discusses rejecting the usual free-will assumption in deterministic theories, and The unconstrained initial state (p. 6) describes requirements for a model. Neither says that no theory giving up NSD has yet reproduced all quantum-mechanical predictions. I searched for that assertion using terms about deterministic theories, measurement independence, and reproducing quantum predictions. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [1][1] J. S. Bell, 'On the Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky paradox,' Physica 1 (1964) 195. Peprinted as chapter 2 of Ref.
- [2][2]; 'Free variables and local causality,' Epistemological Letters Feb. 1977. Reprinted as chapter 12 of Ref. [2]. - [2] J. S. Bell, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987). -
- [3][3] A. Bassi and G.C. Ghirardi, 'The Conway-Kochen argument and relativistic GRW models', quant-ph/0610209, J. Found. Phys. , to be publ. - · arXiv
- [4][4] J. Conway and S. Kochen, quant-ph/0604079 . - · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox
Bong, K.-W., Utreras-Alarcón, A., Ghafari, F., Liang, Y.-C., Tischler, N., Cavalcanti, E. G., Pryde, G. J., & Wiseman, H. M. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Hooft, G. '.
- Corresponding author
- Hooft, Gerard 't
- ORCID
- Hooft, Gerard 't
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2007
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- quant-ph/0701097
- OpenAlex
- W6981896366
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 38
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- hidden variables, quantum mechanics, determinism, causality, locality, wave function phase, measurement settings, interpretation of quantum mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
