Approximation by Quantum Circuits
Open accessAbstract
In a recent preprint by Deutsch et al. [1995] the authors suggest the possibility of polynomial approximability of arbitrary unitary operations on $n$ qubits by 2-qubit unitary operations. We address that comment by proving strong lower bounds on the approximation capabilities of g-qubit unitary operations for fixed g. We consider approximation of unitary operations on subspaces as well as approximation of states and of density matrices by quantum circuits in several natural metrics. The ability of quantum circuits to probabilistically solve decision problem and guess checkable functions is discussed. We also address exact unitary representation by reducing the upper bound by a factor of n^2 and by formalizing the argument given by Barenco et al. [1995] for the lower bound. The overall conclusion is that almost all problems are hard to solve with quantum circuits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observing different measurement outcome probabilities for the pure state density matrix and the classical mixture is as hard as swapping the two branch states.
“A calculation shows that observing different measurement outcome probabilities for the pure state density matrix |ψ⟩ ⟨ψ| and the classical mixture |a⟩⟨a|+|b⟩⟨b| 2 is as hard as swapping |a⟩ and |b⟩ [52].”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
The proxy metrics for interference and distinguishability are within a constant factor O(1) of the true interference and distinguishability complexities.
“It was shown in [52] that these proxy metrics are within a constant factor O(1) of the true interference and distinguishability complexities 4 .”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 136
- Authors
- Knill, E.
- Corresponding author
- Knill, E.
- ORCID
- Knill, E.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1995
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- quant-ph/9508006
- OpenAlex
- W1559981310
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
- Keywords
- unitary operations, lower bounds, probabilistic computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
