The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Remarks on Bounds for Quantum Codes
Open accessAbstract
We present some results that show that bounds from classical coding theory still work in many cases of quantum coding theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For any Jn, k, dK qubit error-correcting code, the quantum Singleton bound is given by the inequality: n− k ≥ 2(d− 1) . (10.4)”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [78]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“The quantum Hamming bound, also known as the sphere-packing bound, provides a powerful upper bound on the achievable encoding rate of a QEC code by relating the code's parameters to the geometry of the underlying Hilbert space [76, 78].”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [78]
In the citing paper
“The quantum Singleton bound establishes a different kind of limit on the parameters of a quantum error-correcting code [24, 78, 219].”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [78]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [1][1] P.W. Shor and R. Laflamme, 'Quantum analog of the MacWilliams identities in classical coding theory,' LANL e-print quant-ph/9610040. - · arXiv
- [3][3] V.I. Levenshtein, 'Krawtchouk Polynomials and Universal Bounds for Codes and Designs in Hamming Spaces,' IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory , 41 , no. 5, 1995, pp. 1303-1321. -
- [4][4] P. Delsarte, 'Bounds for unrestricted codes, by linear programming,' Philips Res. Reports , 27 , 1972, pp. 272-289. -
- [5][5] E. Knill and R. Laflamme, 'A theory of quantum error correcting codes,' LANL e-print quant-ph/9604034. - · arXiv
- [7][7] R. Cleve, 'Quantum stabilizer codes and classical linear codes,' LANL e-print quant-ph/9612048. - · arXiv
- [8][8] R.J. McEliece, E.R. Rodemich, H. Rumsey Jr., and L.R. Welch, 'New upper bounds on the rate of a code via the Delsarte-MacWilliams inequalities,' IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory, vol. IT-23, 1977, pp. 157-166. -
- [11][11] M. J. Aaltonen, 'A new bound on nonbinary block codes,'Discr. Math., vol. 83, pp. 139-160, 1990. Figure 1: A is a bound for nondegenerate stabilizer codes; B is a bound for degenerate codes; C is a bound for degenerate stabilizer codes from [7]; D is bound based on a complementary code written in the binary form (6); E is a bound for degenerate stabilizer codes based on the classical bound from [11]. 9 <!-- image --> Figure 2: A is a bound for k 1 = 0 ; B is a bound for k 1 = 0 . 2 ; C is a bound for k 1 = 0 . 5 . <!-- image -->
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial
Spencer, D. J., Jain, S. P., Tanggara, A., Sun, Z., Haug, T., Khu, D., & Bharti, K. (2026) · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashikhmin, A.
- Corresponding author
- Ashikhmin, Alexei
- ORCID
- Ashikhmin, Alexei
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1997
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- quant-ph/9705037
- OpenAlex
- W1651401973
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum error-correcting codes, code rate bounds, quantum channel capacity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
