Causal models of achievement motive, goal orientation, intrinsic interest, and academic achievement in classroom.
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated the effect of achievement motive on goal orientation, and that of goal orientation on intrinsic interest in learning and academic achievement, based on the model proposed by Elliot and Church (1997). A sample of 222 fifth and sixth grade students of an elementary school, and another of 307 seventh, eighth and ninth grade students of a junior high school participated in the study. The approach-avoidance framework of Elliot and Harackiewicz (1996) was used to classify goal orientations. With multiple-sample structural equation modeling, the paths in two causal models, one for each of the elementary and junior high school samples, were compared. A path was found from hope for success to mastery orientation, from both hope for success and fear of failure to performance-approach orientation, and from fear of failure to performance-avoidance orientation. Mastery and performance-approach orientations each had a positive effect on intrinsic interest in learning. For elementary school children, performance-approach orientation enhanced academic achievement, and for junior high school students, mastery orientation mainly facilitated it. Performance-avoidance orientation had a negative effect on both intrinsic interest and academic achievement.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Intrinsic Interest Scale has construct validity and internal consistency.
“Tanaka and Yamauchi [68] showed the construct validity and internal consistency of this scale.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 27
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. 1991 Need achievement revisited: Verification of Atkinson's original 2X2 model. In C. D. Spielberger, I. G. Sar ason, Z. Kulcsar & G. L. Van Heck (Eds.), Stress and emotion: Anxiety, anger, and curiosity, Vol. 14. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. Pp. 85-105.
- 豊 田秀 樹 1992 SASに よ る共 分 散 構 造 分 析 東 京 大学 出版 会 (Toyoda, H. 1992 Covariance structure analysis with SAS. Tokyoo University of Tokyo Press.)
- Authors
- Tanaka, A., & Yamauchi, H.
- Affiliations
- Doshisha University (JP)
- Venue
- The Japanese journal of psychology
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-324
- ISSN
- 0021-5236 (ISSN-L)
- 1884-1082
- OpenAlex
- W2228473084
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- ja
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Japanese journal of psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- achievement motive, goal orientation, intrinsic interest, academic performance, mastery orientation, performance-approach goals, performance-avoidance goals, hope for success, fear of failure, elementary school students, junior high school students, causal models
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Child, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review