Cited by 86Fire effects on ecosystemsFire dynamics and safety researchCombustion and flame dynamics

Fire Metrology: Current and Future Directions in Physics-Based Measurements

Open access
Kremens, Robert L., Smith, Alistair M. S., Dickinson, Matthew B.·2010·Fire Ecology

Abstract

The robust evaluation of fire impacts on the biota, soil, and atmosphere requires measurement and analysis methods that can characterize combustion processes across a range of temporal and spatial scales. Numerous challenges are apparent in the literature. These challenges have led to novel research to quantify the 1) structure and heterogeneity of the pre-fire vegetation; 2) energy released during the combustion process and the ultimate disposition of that energy through conduction, radiation, and convective transport; and 3) landscape-scale impacts of fire on soils, vegetation, and atmosphere. The grand challenge is how to integrate the pre-, active-, and post-fire measurements and physical process models into a single robust and well validated framework. This paper presents a brief review of the current state of fire metrology research and proposes future research to address the measurement grand challenge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4996/fireecology.0601013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fire metrology links plant injuries to post-fire recovery of ecosystems.

    “New approaches to measure thermal properties, dubbed fire metrology (Kremens, Smith, & Dickinson, 2010), link plant injuries to post-fire recovery of ecosystems.”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Kremens et al., 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers

    McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works

    “…that thresholds of spatial and/or temporal scales exist at which the relative influence of these factors shifts substantially (d, e) New approaches to measure thermal properties, dubbed fire metrology (Kremens, Smith, & Dickinson, 2010), link plant injuries to post-fire recovery of ecosystems.”

Authors
Kremens, R. L., Smith, A. M. S., & Dickinson, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Kremens, Robert L.
Venue
Fire Ecology
Published
2010-04
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
13-35
ISSN
1933-9747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132838771
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Fire Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0814387)
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPS-0814387)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Combustion and flame dynamics
Keywords
fire impacts, heat transfer, fire-atmosphere interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review