Fire Metrology: Current and Future Directions in Physics-Based Measurements
Open accessAbstract
The robust evaluation of fire impacts on the biota, soil, and atmosphere requires measurement and analysis methods that can characterize combustion processes across a range of temporal and spatial scales. Numerous challenges are apparent in the literature. These challenges have led to novel research to quantify the 1) structure and heterogeneity of the pre-fire vegetation; 2) energy released during the combustion process and the ultimate disposition of that energy through conduction, radiation, and convective transport; and 3) landscape-scale impacts of fire on soils, vegetation, and atmosphere. The grand challenge is how to integrate the pre-, active-, and post-fire measurements and physical process models into a single robust and well validated framework. This paper presents a brief review of the current state of fire metrology research and proposes future research to address the measurement grand challenge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fire metrology links plant injuries to post-fire recovery of ecosystems.
“New approaches to measure thermal properties, dubbed fire metrology (Kremens, Smith, & Dickinson, 2010), link plant injuries to post-fire recovery of ecosystems.”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Kremens et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“…that thresholds of spatial and/or temporal scales exist at which the relative influence of these factors shifts substantially (d, e) New approaches to measure thermal properties, dubbed fire metrology (Kremens, Smith, & Dickinson, 2010), link plant injuries to post-fire recovery of ecosystems.”
- Authors
- Kremens, R. L., Smith, A. M. S., & Dickinson, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Idaho (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kremens, Robert L.
- Venue
- Fire Ecology
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-35
- ISSN
- 1933-9747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132838771
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Fire Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0814387)
- U.S. Forest Service
- Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPS-0814387)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Combustion and flame dynamics
- Keywords
- fire impacts, heat transfer, fire-atmosphere interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review