An overview of dye removal via activated carbon adsorption process
Open accessAbstract
Water scarcity and pollution rank equal to climate change as the most intricate environmental turmoil for the 21st century. Today, the percolation of textile effluents into the waterways and ecosystems remain a fastidious conundrum towards the public health and food chain interference. In such circumstances, it becomes mandatory for each dye emitting industry or facility to opt for proper dye control measures. With the renaissance of activated carbon, there has been a steadily growing interest in this research field. This paper attempts to postulate a state of the art review of dye processing industry, its fundamental characteristics and environmental implications. Moreover, the key advance of proposed precursors, activated agents, together with the effects of adsorbent dosage, concentration, contact time, pH, particle size, temperature competition, and isotherms, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of dyes onto activated carbons are summarized and discussed. Conclusively, the expanding of adsorption science in dye treatment represents a plausible tool for accruing the worldwide environmental benefit and shaping the national economy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oxidative treatments (acids) and base treatments (alkaline) are excellent activation agents for activated carbon preparation.
“Foo & Hameed44 reported that oxidative treatments (acids) and base treatments (alkaline) are excellent activation agents for activated carbon (AC) preparation.”
From The removal of anionic and cationic dyes from an aqueous solution using biomass-based activated carbon (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 205 · Cited by 263
- Authors
- Foo, K. Y., & Hameed, B. H.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Venue
- Desalination and Water Treatment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 255-274
- ISSN
- 1944-3986 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044171367
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Desalination and Water Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- dye removal, activated carbon, adsorption, textile wastewater, dye wastewater treatment, adsorption isotherms, adsorption kinetics, adsorption thermodynamics, adsorbent dosage, pH effect, competitive adsorption, activated carbon precursors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review