The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Evaluation of Longevity of Fluoride Release from Three Different Fluoride Varnishes: An Observational Study
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Singh et al.36 reported that Enamelast varnish (group II) released less fluoride over 3 months, with significantly (p < 0.001) higher fluoride release from Enamel Pro varnish (group III). However, after 6 months, Enamelast varnish released more fluoride than both Enamel Pro varnish and Fluor Protector varnish.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 1. Virupaxi SG, Roshan NM, Poornima P, et al. Comparative evaluation of longevity of fluoride release from three different fluoride varnishes - an invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(8):ZC33–ZC36. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19209.8242 · DOI
- 2. Schemahorn BR, Wood GD, Mc Hale W, et al. Comparison of fluoride uptake into tooth enamel from two fluoride varnishes containing different calcium phosphate sources. J Clin Dent 2011;22(2):51–54.
- 3. Vaikuntam J. Fluoride varnishes: should we be using them? Pediatr Dent J 2000;22(6):513–516.
- 4. Bansal A, Ingle NA, Kaur N, et al. Recent advancements in fluoride: a systematic review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5(5):341–346. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.165927 · DOI
- 5. Abdoli E, Javadinejad S, Khosravanifard B. Comparison of fluoride uptake into dental enamel from two types of sodium fluoride varnishes (in vitro). J Res Dent Sci 2015;11(4):215–220.
- 6. Bonetti D, Clarkson JE. Fluoride varnish for caries prevention: efficacy and implementation. Caries Res 2016;50(Suppl 1):45–49. DOI: 10.1159/000444268 · DOI
- 7. Comar LP, Souza BM, Grizzo LT, et al. Evaluation of fluoride release from experimental TiF4 and NaF varnishes in vitro. J Appl Oral Sci 2014;22(2):138–143. DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130574 · DOI
- 8. Pańczyszyn DP, Kaczmarek U. Fluoride release from fluoride varnish under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Dent Med Probl 2017;54(4):327–331. · DOI
- 9. Epple M, Enax J, Meyer F. Prevention of caries and dental erosion by fluorides-a critical discussion based on physico-chemical data and principles. Dent J (Basel) 2022;10(1). DOI: 10.3390/dj10010006 · DOI
- 10. Seppä L. Fluoride varnishes in caries prevention. Med Princ Pract 2004;13(6):307–311. DOI: 10.1159/000080466 · DOI
- 11. Attiguppe P, Malik N, Ballal S, et al. CPP-ACP and fluoride: a synergism to combat caries. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):120–125. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1608 · DOI · Paper page
- 12. Godoi FA, Carlos NR, Bridi EC, et al. Remineralizing effect of commercial fluoride varnishes on artificial enamel lesions. Braz Oral Res 2019;33:e044. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0044 · DOI · Paper page
- 13. Zabokova-Bilbilova E, Sotirovska-Ivkovska A, Evrosimovska B, et al. Effect of fluoride varnish on demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Balk J Stom 2012;16:157–160.
- 14. Omitola O, Arigbede A. Prevalence of dental caries among adult patients attending a tertiary dental institution in the South-South region of Nigeria. Port Harcourt Med J 2011;6(1):52–58.
- 15. Urzua I, Mendoza C, Arteaga O, et al. Dental caries prevalence and tooth loss in Chilean adult population: first national dental examination survey. Int J Dent 2012;2012:810170. DOI: 10.1155/2012/810170 · DOI
- 16. Agbelusi GA, Jeboda SO. Oral health status of 12-year-old Nigerian children. West Afr J Med 2006;25(3):195–198. DOI: 10.4314/wajm.v25i3.28277 · DOI
- 17. Roopa KB, Pathak S, Poornima P, et al. White spot lesion: a literature review. J Pediatr Dent 2015;3(1):1. DOI: 10.4103/2321-6646.151839 · DOI
- 18. Newbrun E. Topical fluorides in caries prevention and management: a North American perspective. J Dent Edu 2001;65(10):1078–1083. · DOI
- 19. Corona SA, Nascimento TN, Catirse AB, et al. Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30(12):1183–1189. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01185.x · DOI
- 20. Zero DT, Raubertas RF, Fu J, et al. Fluoride concentrations in plaque, whole saliva, and ductal saliva after application of home-use topical fluorides [published erratum appears in J Dent Res 1993 Jan;72(1):87]. J Dent Res 1992;71(11):1768–1775. DOI: 10.1177/00220345920710110201 · DOI
- 21. Nelson DG, Jongebloed WL, Arends J. Morphology of enamel surfaces treated with topical fluoride agents: SEM considerations. J Dent Res 1983;62(12):1201–1208. DOI: 10.1177/00220345830620120501 · DOI
- 22. de Bruyn H, Arends J. Fluoride varnishes: a review. J Biol Buccale 1987;15(2):71–82.
- 23. Nalbantgil D, Oztoprak MO, Cakan DG, et al. Prevention of demineralization around orthodontic brackets using two different fluoride varnishes. Eur J Dent 2013;7(1):41–47. · DOI
- 24. Seubert A, Frenzel W, Schäfer GH, et al. Sample preparation techniques for ion chromatography. Metrohm 2021;2:1–12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baidya, D., Pathivada, L., Garg, N., Karthik, K. M., Jain, A. K., & Bhyri, P. (2026) · International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3470
Metadata
- Authors
- Vashisth, P., Naik, S., Sharma, S., Murry, J. N., Singh, V., & Chandak, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
- Publisher
- Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
- Published
- 2024-06-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-345
- ISSN
- 0974-7052
- 0975-1904
- PMC
- PMC11320789
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review