Incidence of medication error in critical care unit of a tertiary care hospital: where do we stand?
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Medication error in developed countries is of primary concern when there is a question of adversity to a patient's health, but in developing countries like India, it is just a term and its significance is undervalued. The incidence of medication error is essential to estimate the proper medical care provided in the healthcare system. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the study is to determine the incidences of medication error in critical care unit and to evaluate its risk outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study conducted over a period of 6 months in a critical care unit of a tertiary care hospital. Medication chart review method was opted for data collection. The medication errors were mainly classified as prescription, transcription, indenting, dispensing, and administration error. A total of 6,705 charts were reviewed. The NCCMERP risk index was used to evaluate the outcome of errors. RESULTS: Of the total 6,705 charts, 410 medication errors were found, i.e., 6.11%. The most common error is transcription error that constitutes 44.1% of the total errors, followed by prescription error 40%, and administration error 14%. The frequency of indenting and dispensing errors is negligible with 1.5% and 0.5%, respectively. The main causes of medication errors are due to incomplete prescription 50.2% and wrong doses 22.9%. In drug class, antibiotics and antihypertensive agents are most prone to medication error. About 87.1% errors belonged to the Category B of National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention risk index. CONCLUSION: Majority of the errors are transcription errors followed by prescription and administration errors. Consultant doctors have to be more vigilant during prescribing and verifying the medication charts. Clinical pharmacists should act as a checkpoint at each step of medication process to identify and prevent medication errors. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Incidence of Medication Error in Critical Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital: Where Do We Stand? Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(9):799-803.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most medication errors happen in the transcription process, followed by prescription errors and then by errors in administration.
“Most of the errors happen in the transcription process, followed by prescription errors and then by errors in administration [29].”
From Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing the Field of Medical Education (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Medication errors are a significant preventable hazard in the health care system.
“Medication errors are a significant preventable hazard in the health care system.”
From Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing the Field of Medical Education (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 64
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [4]Donaldson MS. An overview of to err is human: re-emphasizing the message of patient safety Hughes RG Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) 2008 21328772
- [14]Wolf ZR Hughes RG. Error reporting and disclosure Hughes RG Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) 2008 21328752
- Authors
- Seta, B., Gholap, S., Aurangabadi, K., Deshmukh, A. M., Wankhede, P., Suryawanshi, P., Vasanth, S., Kurian, M., Philip, E., Jagtap, N., & Pandit, E.
- Affiliations
- Ruby Hall Clinic (IN)
- ORCID
- Suryawanshi, Prasad
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
- Published
- 2020-10-17
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 799-803
- ISSN
- 0972-5229 (ISSN-L)
- 1998-359X
- PMC
- PMC7584841
- OpenAlex
- W3092302587
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Keywords
- medication errors, intensive care unit, transcription errors, prescribing errors, medication administration errors, medication dispensing errors, clinical pharmacist intervention, antibiotic prescribing, antihypertensive drugs, incomplete prescriptions, wrong dose
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review