Cited by 135

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Twenty Five Cases of Acute Hepatitis Following Ingestion of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb

Jung, Kyoung Ah, Min, Hyun Ju, Yoo, Seung Suk, Kim, Hong Jun, Choi, Su Nyoung, Ha, Chang Yoon, Kim, Hyun Jin, Kim, Tae Hyo, Jung, Woon Tae, Lee, Ok Jae, Lee, Jong Sil, Shim, Sang Goon·2011·Gut and Liver

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.4.493

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It seems that most Korean reports followed a retrospective study approach.

    “It seems that most reports followed a retrospective study approach (Table 1),40–54”
  • First authors of reports from Korea contributed as experts were numbered overall 15, and thereby represented a substantial number of publications on 526 HILI cases that had been assessed for causality using RUCAM.

    “First authors of reports from Korea contributed as experts were numbered overall 15, and thereby represented a substantial number of publications on 526 HILI cases that had been assessed for causality using RUCAM (Table 1).40–54”
  • Kim et al., Bae et al., Yang et al., Jung et al., Kim et al., and Woo et al. all provided cases limited to a probable or highly probable causality grading, suggesting complete case data sets or prospective data collection in single case reports.

    “and by Kim et al.,45 Bae et al.,46 Yang et al.,47 Jung et al.,48 Kim et al.,49 and Woo et al.,53 who all provided cases limited to a probable or highly probable causality grading, suggesting complete case data sets or prospective data collection in single case reports.”
  • Laboratory studies have shown that natural medicines such as Heshouwu, Leigongteng, or Xiao-Chai-Hu-Tang cause immune activation, metabolic disorders, apoptosis and damage to liver cells.

    “although laboratory studies have also shown that these treatments cause immune activation, metabolic disorders, apoptosis and damage to liver cells.[35][36][37][38][39]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Verma, 2009, Gut, 58, 1555, 10.1136/gut.2008.163675 · DOI
  2. Biour, 2004, Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 28, 720, 10.1016/S0399-8320(04)95062-2 · DOI
  3. Larrey, 2000, J Hepatol, 32, 77, 10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80417-1 · DOI
  4. Meier, 2005, Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 61, 135, 10.1007/s00228-004-0888-z · DOI
  5. Bagheri, 2000, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 50, 479, 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00282.x · DOI
  6. Sgro, 2002, Hepatology, 36, 451, 10.1053/jhep.2002.34857 · DOI · Paper page
  7. MacGregor, 1989, BMJ, 299, 1156, 10.1136/bmj.299.6708.1156 · DOI
  8. Woolf, 1994, Ann Intern Med, 121, 729, 10.7326/0003-4819-121-10-199411150-00001 · DOI
  9. Gordon, 1995, JAMA, 273, 489, 10.1001/jama.1995.03520300063038 · DOI
  10. Chitturi, 2000, J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 15, 1093, 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02349.x · DOI
  11. Seeff, 2007, Clin Liver Dis, 11, 577, 10.1016/j.cld.2007.06.005 · DOI
  12. Stickel, 2000, Public Health Nutr, 3, 113, 10.1017/S1368980000000161 · DOI
  13. Stickel, 2005, J Hepatol, 43, 901, 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.08.002 · DOI
  14. But, 1996, Vet Hum Toxicol, 38, 280
  15. Park, 2001, J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 16, 115, 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2001.02309.x · DOI
  16. Laird, 2008, J Clin Gastroenterol, 42, 861, 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181492515 · DOI
  17. Mazzanti, 2004, Ann Intern Med, 140, W30, 10.7326/0003-4819-140-7-200404060-00042-w3 · DOI
  18. Panis, 2005, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 41, 256, 10.1097/01.MPG.0000164699.41282.67 · DOI
  19. Cárdenas, 2006, J Clin Gastroenterol, 40, 629, 10.1097/00004836-200608000-00014 · DOI
  20. Cho, 2009, Gut Liver, 3, 52, 10.5009/gnl.2009.3.1.52 · DOI
  21. Maria, 1997, Hepatology, 26, 664, 10.1002/hep.510260319 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Bénichou, 1990, J Hepatol, 11, 272, 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90124-A · DOI · Paper page
  23. Rochon, 2008, Hepatology, 48, 1175, 10.1002/hep.22442 · DOI
  24. Rockey, 2010, Hepatology, 51, 2117, 10.1002/hep.23577 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kessler, 2001, Ann Intern Med, 135, 262, 10.7326/0003-4819-135-4-200108210-00011 · DOI
  26. de Witte, 1990, Hepatogastroenterology, 37, 601
  27. Lucena, 2008, Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 22, 141, 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00566.x · DOI
  28. Ernst, 2004, Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 13, 767, 10.1002/pds.1014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jung, K. A., Min, H. J., Yoo, S. S., Kim, H. J., Choi, S. N., Ha, C. Y., Kim, H. J., Kim, T. H., Jung, W. T., Lee, O. J., Lee, J. S., & Shim, S. G.
Venue
Gut and Liver
Published
2011-12-30
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
493-499
ISSN
  • 1976-2283
  • 2005-1212
Cited by
135
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review