Cited by 156Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Driving Simulator Sickness: An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature

Classen, Sherrilene, Bewernitz, Megan, Shechtman, Orit·2011·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Guided by the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process (2nd edition; American Occupational Therapy Association, 2008 ) , we conducted an evidence-based review on simulator sickness (SS). METHOD. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, SafetyLit, Google Scholar, and recently published literature. We used the American Academy of Neurology’s classification criteria to extract data from 10 studies and assign each a level of 1–4, with “1” indicating the highest level of evidence. We grouped studies that addressed SS into client factors, context and environment factors, and activity demands. RESULTS. Client factors (i.e., older clients [>70 yr; Level B], women [Level B]) and context/environment factors (e.g., refresh rates, scenario design and duration, simulator configuration, and calibration; Level B) probably increase the rates of SS, whereas activity demands (vection, speed of driving, and postural instability; Level C) possibly contribute to SS. CONCLUSION. We classified factors contributing to SS and identified the need for randomized trials to identify causes of SS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.2011.000802

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The occurrence of VIMS is tightly linked to the occurrence of vection, in the sense that VIMS does not seem to occur in participants who do not perceive vection.

    “These and other results (e.g., Lee et al., 1997; Stoffregen and Smart, 1998; Classen et al., 2011) indicate that the occurrence of VIMS is tightly linked to the occurrence of vection, in the sense that VIMS does not seem to occur in participants who do not perceive vection.”

    From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Classen et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Classen, S., Bewernitz, M., & Shechtman, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Classen, Sherrilene
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2011-03
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
179-188
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2014317377
Cited by
156
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
simulator sickness, driving simulator, virtual reality, motion sickness, client factors, vection, postural instability, simulator calibration, older adults, gender differences
MeSH terms
Automobile Driving, Computer Simulation, Occupational Therapy, Psychomotor Performance, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review