Cited by 121Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Patient Involvement

Occupational Therapy Interventions for Recovery in the Areas of Community Integration and Normative Life Roles for Adults With Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review

Gibson, Robert W., D’Amico, Mariana, Jaffe, Lynn, Arbesman, Marian·2011·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

This systematic review investigated research literature evaluating the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions focusing on recovery in the areas of community integration and normative life roles for people with serious mental illness. The review included occupation- and activity-based interventions and interventions addressing performance skills and performance patterns, aspects of context and environment, activity demands, and client factors. The results indicated that the evidence of the effectiveness of social skills training is moderate to strong. The evidence for the effectiveness of life skills and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) training to improve performance is moderate, as is the evidence for neurocognitive training paired with skills training in the areas of work, social participation, and IADLs. The evidence for client-centered intervention and increased intensity and duration of treatment is limited but positive, and the evidence that providing intervention in the natural context is more beneficial than in the clinic setting is inconclusive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.2011.001297

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 121

Authors
Gibson, R. W., D’Amico, M., Jaffe, L., & Arbesman, M.
Affiliations
  • Augusta University (US)
  • American Occupational Therapy Association (US)
Corresponding author
Arbesman, Marian
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2011-05
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
247-256
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2037200435
Cited by
121
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Center for Mental Health Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
occupational therapy intervention, severe mental illness, recovery, social reintegration, social skills training, life skills training, instrumental activities of daily living, neurocognitive training, client-centered intervention, treatment intensity, naturalistic intervention, social participation (health and rehabilitation), work
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Self Concept, Social Support, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review