Occupational Therapy Interventions for Recovery in the Areas of Community Integration and Normative Life Roles for Adults With Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review
Abstract
This systematic review investigated research literature evaluating the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions focusing on recovery in the areas of community integration and normative life roles for people with serious mental illness. The review included occupation- and activity-based interventions and interventions addressing performance skills and performance patterns, aspects of context and environment, activity demands, and client factors. The results indicated that the evidence of the effectiveness of social skills training is moderate to strong. The evidence for the effectiveness of life skills and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) training to improve performance is moderate, as is the evidence for neurocognitive training paired with skills training in the areas of work, social participation, and IADLs. The evidence for client-centered intervention and increased intensity and duration of treatment is limited but positive, and the evidence that providing intervention in the natural context is more beneficial than in the clinic setting is inconclusive.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some reviews have pointed out the effectiveness of OT interventions in SMI aimed at facilitating work, community integration or weight loss.
“In fact, some reviews have pointed out the effectiveness of OT interventions in SMI aimed at facilitating work,13 community integration57 or weight loss.58”
From Occupational therapy interventions for adults with severe mental illness: a scoping review (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Gibson, R. W., D’Amico, M., Jaffe, L., & Arbesman, M.
- Affiliations
- Augusta University (US)
- American Occupational Therapy Association (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arbesman, Marian
- Venue
- American Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-256
- ISSN
- 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7676
- OpenAlex
- W2037200435
- Semantic Scholar
- 3cf7bebb64170e84f025bbd506fa1784f1cb1742
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Center for Mental Health Services
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- occupational therapy intervention, severe mental illness, recovery, social reintegration, social skills training, life skills training, instrumental activities of daily living, neurocognitive training, client-centered intervention, treatment intensity, naturalistic intervention, social participation (health and rehabilitation), work
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Self Concept, Social Support, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Social Participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review