The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sensory Profile: The Performance of a National Sample of Children Without Disabilities
Abstract
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to obtain data about a national sample of children without disabilities on the 125-item revision of the Sensory Profile, a tool derived from sensory history items reported in the literature and designed to evaluate children’s responses to commonly occurring sensory events. Method. Parents of 1,115 children completed the Sensory Profile. The children were 3 to 10 years of age and did not have disabilities. Parents used a 5-point Likert scale to report the percentage of time their children engaged in each behavior Researchers then analyzed the data, using multivariate methods to identify trends in performance and age and gender differences. Results. Ninety-one (73%) of the profile’s 125 items were found to be uncommon behaviors for this national sample of children without disabilities. Although age and gender differences were significant ( p < .001), effect sizes were so small (i.e., below .2) that differences were not meaningful for clinical application (i.e., mean differences less than .5 points). Only two items in the visual category approached a 1-point difference when comparing younger and older children. Conclusion. There were no meaningful gender differences on the revised Sensory Profile, and only 2 items approached a meaningful difference related to age. Nearly three fourths of the items on the profile were uncommon for children without disabilities. If children with various disabilities display these behaviors, the Sensory Profile can be useful in evaluation and program planning for children with disabilities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An exploratory factor analysis of a previous version of this instrument, the sensory profile (SP), revealed a 9-factor solution.”
From Assessment of Sensory Processing and Executive Functions in Childhood: Development, Reliability, and Validity of the EPYFEI (2018) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory
Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Ludlow, L. H., Haltiwanger, J. T., & Andrellos, P. J. (1992) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t08316-000 · Cited by 438
The Ecology of Human Performance: A Framework for Considering the Effect of Context
Dunn, W., Brown, C. E., & McGuigan, A. (1994) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.48.7.595 · Cited by 388
Self-citationPeabody developmental motor scales
Folio (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 256
Touch Inventory for Elementary-School-Aged Children
Royeen, C. B., & Fortune, J. C. (1990) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.44.2.155 · Cited by 59
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tomchek, S. D., & Dunn, W. (2007) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.61.2.190 · Cited by 1,534
Self-citationDunn, W. (1997) · Infants & Young Children · doi:10.1097/00001163-199704000-00005 · Cited by 899
Self-citationThe Sensations of Everyday Life: Empirical, Theoretical, and Pragmatic Considerations
Dunn, W. (2001) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.55.6.608 · Cited by 617
Self-citationSensory integration and the perceptual experience of persons with autism
Iarocci, G., & McDonald, J. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0044-3 · Cited by 376
Dunn, W. (2007) · Infants & Young Children · doi:10.1097/01.iyc.0000264477.05076.5d · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, W., & Westman, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- Dunn, Winnie
- Venue
- American Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-34
- ISSN
- 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7676
- OpenAlex
- W2099997470
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (MCJ-209319-01-0)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- sensory profile, sensory processing, children without disabilities, reference values, age differences, gender differences, sensory behavior, children with disabilities, parent report, occupational therapy assessment
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Reference Values, Sensation, Social Adjustment, Multivariate Analysis, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review