Praxis Skills in Young Children With Down Syndrome, Other Developmental Disabilities, and Typically Developing Children
Open accessAbstract
This study explored whether young children with Down syndrome show praxis deficits that impact activities of daily living, and whether these deficits are specific to Down syndrome. We compared the performance of young children with Down syndrome, a mental age-matched group of children with developmental disabilities of mixed or unknown etiologies, and a group of typically developing infants and toddlers on praxis tasks and overall adaptive behavior (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales). Children with Down syndrome showed poorer overall motor functioning than the developmental disabilities comparison group as measured by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, F (2, 47) = 5.24, p < .01 (using one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]). A one-way multivariate analysis of variance also showed that children with Down syndrome performed significantly worse overall than the developmental disabilities comparison group on a battery of praxis tasks, F (7, 18) = 2.95, p < .05, and a series of object retrieval tasks, F (7, 18) = 2.95, p < .05, suggesting a deficit in praxis that is specific to Down syndrome. Children with Down syndrome elicited significantly more help than both comparison groups during object retrieval trials, F (2, 48) = 4.94, p < .01 (using one-way ANOVA). When chronological age was partialled out, a strong relationship was observed between praxis and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome, r (8) = .69, p < .05. These findings suggest that young children with Down syndrome may need targeted interventions that focus on both praxis skills and motivational orientation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive and brain structure deficits in Down syndrome emerge as early as 6 months of age and progress to have substantial impacts on daily life, academic and occupational outcomes.
“These cognitive and brain structure deficits emerge as early as 6 months of age and progress to have substantial impacts on daily life, as well as academic and occupational outcomes5–7.”
From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Fidler, D. J., Hepburn, S. L., Mankin, G., & Rogers, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- University of Colorado Health (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-138
- ISSN
- 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7676
- PMC
- PMC4512666
- OpenAlex
- W2099931028
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD035468, L30 HD048361, U19HD035468, R03HD041942)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, praxis, developmental disabilities, motor function, adaptive behavior, object retrieval, activities of daily living, typically developing children, infants and toddlers, help-seeking, motivational orientation
- MeSH terms
- Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Task Performance and Analysis, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review