Cited by 78Child Welfare and AdoptionChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

The relation between length of institutionalization and sensory integration in children adopted from Eastern Europe

Lin, Susan H., Cermak, Sharon, Coster, Wendy J., Miller, Laurie·2005·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between length of institutionalization and sensory integration in children adopted from Eastern Europe. METHOD: The Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT) and the Developmental and Sensory Processing Questionnaire were administered to 60 adopted children, 4 years to 8 years, 11 months of age. Thirty had longer institutionalization histories (mean: 34 months; LIH group) and the other 30 had shorter institutionalization histories (mean: 3 months; SIH group). RESULTS: The LIH group demonstrated significantly lower scores than the SIH group on the SIPT in vestibular-proprioceptive, visual, and praxis areas, and effect sizes ranged from .09 to 1.13. The LIH group also had significantly more frequent behaviors suggestive of sensory modulation dysfunction compared to the SIH group, particularly in touch and movement seeking, vision, and audition. Effect sizes ranged from 0 to 1.39. CONCLUSION: Longer lengths of institutionalization are associated with more atypical sensory discrimination, praxis, and sensory modulation scores in children adopted from Eastern European orphanages. The areas of sensory integration that appear to be more vulnerable to deprived conditions in early childhood are vestibular-proprioceptive, tactile, visual, auditory, and praxis. Adopted children with lengthy periods of institutionalization may benefit from occupational therapy for early sensory integrative and developmental screenings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.59.2.139

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of children adopted specifically from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union at a median age of 26 months (range 2.5 months to 9 years), 70% had gross motor delays and 82% had fine motor delays.

    “in a study of children adopted specifically from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union at a median age of 26 months (range 2.5 months to 9 years), 70% had gross motor delays and 82% had fine motor delays,20”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 78

Authors
Lin, S. H., Cermak, S., Coster, W. J., & Miller, L.
Affiliations
  • Shenandoah University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Susan H.
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2005-03
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
139-147
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2163425677
Cited by
78
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (MCJ 901, 5T3207462-04)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
length of institutionalization, sensory integration, adopted children, praxis, sensory discrimination, early childhood deprivation, Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests
MeSH terms
Adoption, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Infant, Institutionalization, Male, Motor Skills, Sensation Disorders, Sensory Deprivation, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, Orphanages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review