Cited by 91Crime Patterns and InterventionsUrban Transport and AccessibilityTransportation Planning and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Factors Influencing Young Peoples’ Perceptions of Personal Safety on Public Transport

Open access
Currie, Graham, Delbosc, Alexa, Mahmoud, Sarah·2013·Journal of Public Transportation

Abstract

This paper explores factors influencing perceptions of safety on public transport using an empirical analysis of a survey of young people in Melbourne, Australia. In the literature, some studies disagree as to the extent to which perceptions of safety are affected by actual experience of crime. Some suggest perceptions of personal safety are not justified by actual crime rates, whereas others find that direct experience of unsafe incidents results in greater safety concerns. Related research suggests that psychological factors can make some people feel uncomfortable on public transport and that this may increase perceptions of poor personal safety. However, these links have not yet been tested empirically in the public transport context. In this study, three statistically reliable MANOVA models demonstrated that psychological influences, i.e., “feeling comfortable with people you don’t know on public transport,” had the largest individual influence on perceptions of safety with a medium-size effect. Gender and actual experiences of a personal safety incident also influenced perceptions of personal safety but with a small effect size. Overall, the research suggests that feelings of anxiety and discomfort associated with traveling with people you do not know is the most influential factor driving negative feelings of personal safety on public transport. Gender and actual experience of unsafe incidents were not as important. Areas for further research are identified.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5038/2375-0901.16.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have highlighted that age may have an indirect impact negatively influencing perceived safety.

    “However, other studies have highlighted that age may have an indirect impact negatively influencing perceived safety (Currie et al., 2013; Valentine, 1989; Zavattaro, 2019).”

    From Women's perceived safety in public places and public transport: A narrative review of contributing factors and measurement methods (2025) · cites this paper as Currie et al., 2013

    The Research Context says older people are more likely to fear crime, and the Methodology notes that earlier studies found particularly high safety concerns among older adult riders. These passages support an association between age and perceived safety, but they do not establish that age has an indirect effect; the paper says its 18–25-year-old sample limits its ability to examine age. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Box, S., C. Hale, and G. Andrews. 1988. Explaining fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology 28(3):340-356.
  2. Cozens, Paul, Richard Neale, Jeremy Whitaker, and David Hillier. 2003. Managing crime and fear of crime at railway stations -A case study in South Wales (UK). International Journal of Transport Management 1: 121-132.
  3. Crime Concern. 2002. People perceptions of personal security and their concerns about crime on public transport: Literature review. London, UK: Department for Transport.
  4. Feltes, Thomas. 2003. Public safety and public spaces: The citizen's fear of strangers. In Vandalism, Terrorism and Security in Urban Public Transport, Round Table 123, edited by European Conference for Ministers of Transport: Economic Research Centre.
  5. Greenberg, C. I., and I. J. Firestone. 1977. Compensatory responses to crowding: Effects of personal space instrusion and privacy reduction. Journal of Personal ity and Social Psychology 35(9): 637-644.
  6. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. 1997. Inner city commercial strips: Evolution decay or retrofit? Town Planning Review 68(1): 1-29.
  7. Mawby, R., and M. Gill. 1987. Crime Victims: Needs, Services and the Voluntary Sec tor. London UK: Routledge Kegan & Paul (November 1987).
  8. Nicosia, Gregory J., Douglas Hyman, Robert A Karlin, Yakov M. Epstein, and John R. Aiello. 1979. Effects of bodily contact on reactions to crowding. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 9(6): 508-523.
  9. Toseland, Ronald W. 1982. Fear of crime: Who is most vulnerable? Journal of Crimi nal Justice 10: 199-209.

Metadata

Authors
Currie, G., Delbosc, A., & Mahmoud, S.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Allgemeiner Deutscher Automobil Club (DE)
Venue
Journal of Public Transportation
Published
2013-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 1077-291X (ISSN-L)
  • 2375-0901
OpenAlex
W2051420086
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Transportation (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
public transport, youth, psychological factors, gender differences, crime perception, travel anxiety, Melbourne

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review