The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Perfect Law in an Imperfect Society: Ibn Taymiyya’s Concept of “Governance in the Name of the Sacred Law”
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A treatise by the great thirteenth-and fourteenth-century theologian Ibn Taymiyya (d.1328), one of the most popular premodern figures for modern Islamists, separated political action from individual piety or virtue (Anjum 2012, Ibn Taymiyya 2000, Johansen 2008).”
From Political Islam: Theory (2015) · cites this paper as Johansen 2008
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
March, A. F. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-082112-141250 · Cited by 78
Taking People As They Are: Islam As a “Realistic Utopia” in the Political Theory of Sayyid Qutb
MARCH, A. F. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305541000002x · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Johansen, B.
- Corresponding author
- Johansen, Baber
- Venue
- The Law Applied
- Publisher
- I.B. Tauris
- Published
- 2008
- OpenAlex
- W3032711388
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- I.B.Tauris eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Legal and Social Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Law › Evolving Legal Systems and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- law, society
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
