Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 65Income, Poverty, and InequalitySocial Policy and Social Work in BrazilEconomic and Social Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Poverty as Ideology: Rescuing Social Justice From Global Development Agendas

Fischer, Andrew Martin·2018·Zed Books Ltd

Abstract

Winner of the International Studies in Poverty Prize awarded by the Comparative Research Programme on Poverty (CROP) and Zed Books Poverty has become the central focus of global development efforts, with a vast body of research and funding dedicated to its alleviation. And yet, the field of poverty studies remains deeply ideological and has been used to justify wealth and power within the prevailing world order. Andrew Martin Fischer clarifies this deeply political character, from conceptions and measures of poverty through to their application as policies. Poverty as Ideology shows how our dominant approaches to poverty studies have, in fact, served to reinforce the prevailing neoliberal ideology while neglecting the wider interests of social justice that are fundamental to creating more equitable societies. Instead, our development policies have created a ‘poverty industry’ that obscures the dynamic reproductions of poverty within contemporary capitalist development and promotes segregation in the name of

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5040/9781350221932

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Fischer, A. M.
Venue
Zed Books Ltd
Publisher
Zed Books Ltd
Published
2018
OpenAlex
W2611270949
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.60
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zed Books Ltd (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policy and Social Work in Brazil
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Economic and Social Development
Keywords
poverty, ideology, neoliberalism, poverty measurement, poverty reduction, development policy, social justice, capitalism, international development, segregation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.