The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Poverty as Ideology: Rescuing Social Justice From Global Development Agendas
Abstract
Winner of the International Studies in Poverty Prize awarded by the Comparative Research Programme on Poverty (CROP) and Zed Books Poverty has become the central focus of global development efforts, with a vast body of research and funding dedicated to its alleviation. And yet, the field of poverty studies remains deeply ideological and has been used to justify wealth and power within the prevailing world order. Andrew Martin Fischer clarifies this deeply political character, from conceptions and measures of poverty through to their application as policies. Poverty as Ideology shows how our dominant approaches to poverty studies have, in fact, served to reinforce the prevailing neoliberal ideology while neglecting the wider interests of social justice that are fundamental to creating more equitable societies. Instead, our development policies have created a ‘poverty industry’ that obscures the dynamic reproductions of poverty within contemporary capitalist development and promotes segregation in the name of
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But public spending on infrastructure generates a strong demand for foreign exchange (Fischer, 2018;Ocampo, 2013)”
From The Return of Debt Crisis in Developing Countries: Shifting or Maintaining Dominant Development Paradigms? (2023) · cites this paper as Fischer, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Fischer, A. M., & Storm, S. (2023) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/dech.12800 · Cited by 40
Self-citationEl Assal, A. (2025) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.11237
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, A. M.
- Venue
- Zed Books Ltd
- Publisher
- Zed Books Ltd
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W2611270949
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zed Books Ltd (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policy and Social Work in Brazil
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Economic and Social Development
- Keywords
- poverty, ideology, neoliberalism, poverty measurement, poverty reduction, development policy, social justice, capitalism, international development, segregation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.