The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Translating the Queer: Body Politics and Transnational Conversations
Abstract
Translating the Queer focuses on the dissemination of queer knowledge, concepts, and representations throughout Latin America, a migration that has been accompanied by concomitant processes of translation, adaptation, and epistemological resistance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As democratic reforms continue to grant rights based on legible forms of sexual, gendered, or ethnic difference, sexual citizenship expands as and through the marketbased ordering of bodies, and as consumer citizenship (Domínguez-Ruvalcaba 2016, 155).”
From I Monster: Embodying Trans and Travesti Resistance in Latin America (2020) · cites this paper as Domínguez-Ruvalcaba 2016, 155
Citations
Cited by
I Monster: Embodying Trans and Travesti Resistance in Latin America
Pierce, J. M. (2020) · Latin American Research Review · doi:10.25222/larr.563 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruvalcaba, H. D.
- Corresponding author
- Ruvalcaba, Héctor Domínguez
- Venue
- Zed Books
- Publisher
- Zed Books
- Published
- 2016
- OpenAlex
- W3123841992
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zed Books (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
- Keywords
- queer theory, translation, Latin America, adaptation, epistemological resistance, queer representation, migration of ideas
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
