The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Literature and Ethics in High School English Classes: Reading Together with Moral Vision
Abstract
This book offers a defence of ethical reading in secondary school English classes at a time when reformers and policy makers are trying to reorganize English language arts around technical skills or politics.Ross Collin shows how students and teachers use literature as a venue for exploring their own and others’ ethical ideas and practices and argues that moral inquiry in English class is a distinctly social endeavour. The book draws ideas from English education and moral philosophy. From English education, Collin explores social reading, or what Louise Rosenblatt named ‘transaction’, looking at texts commonly taught in secondary school English, including Shakespeare’sRomeo and Julietand Jacqueline Woodson’sBrown Girl Dreaming. From philosophy, he draws on arguments about moral vision and literature developed by Iris Murdoch, Martha Nussbaum, and Nora Hämäläinen, and develops ideas, tacit in English education, about reading with moral vision. He concludes by proposing a new theory of moral vision in transactional reading.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Collin (2024) observes this standardization as resulting in the deprioritization of some of the traditional reasons to study literature in schools.”
From Generative Artificial Intelligence, Formative Epistemic Injustice, and Educators’ Solutions (2026) · cites this paper as Collin (2024)
Citations
Cited by
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Formative Epistemic Injustice, and Educators’ Solutions
Smith, S. J. (2026) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-026-10100-4 · Cited by 2
A Bakhtinian analysis of ethics and education in Anton Chekhov’s Three Sisters
Collin, R. (2025) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhaf041
Self-citationPedagogy of the possessed: teaching, certainty and wonder in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Demons
Collin, R. (2026) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2026.2642027
Self-citationModern education and dependent rational animals in Flannery O’Connor’s “Revelation”
Collin, R., & Heyward, G. (2026) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2026.2700340
Self-citationLiterature and Ideology of Shame in the Secondary English Classroom
Davis-Porada, N. (2026) · Changing English · doi:10.1080/1358684x.2026.2701671
Metadata
- Authors
- Collin, R.
- Corresponding author
- Collin, Ross
- ORCID
- Collin, Ross
- Venue
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Published
- 2024
- OpenAlex
- W4403766279
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
- Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
- Keywords
- ethical reading, moral vision, social reading, ethics in literature, secondary school English, moral inquiry, ethics, Iris Murdoch, Martha Nussbaum, Romeo and Juliet, English language arts curriculum, social construction of morality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.