The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Civil Uprisings in Modern Sudan: The ‘Khartoum Springs’ of 1964 and 1985
Open accessAbstract
In the wake of the protests that toppled regimes across the Middle East in 2011, Sudanese activists and writers have proudly cited their very own ‘Arab Springs’ of 1964 and 1985, which overthrew the country's first two military regimes, as evidence of their role as political pioneers in the region. Whilst some of these claims may be exaggerated, Sudan was indeed unique in the region at the time in that it witnessed not one but two popular uprisings which successfully uprooted military authoritarianisms. Civil Uprisings in Modern Sudan provides the first scholarly book-length history of the 1964 and 1985 uprisings. It explores the uprisings themselves, their legacy and the contemporary relevance they hold in the context of the current political climate of the Middle East. The book also contends that the sort of politics espoused by various kinds of Islamist during the uprisings can be interpreted as a form of early ‘post-Islamism’, in which Islamist political agendas were seen to be compatible with liberalism and democracy. Using interviews, Arabic language sources and a wealth of archival material, this book is an important and original study that is of great significance for scholars of African and Middle Eastern political history.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite widely held grievances, however, nonviolent organized resistance was limited, in part, because the regime had succeeded in dismantling many of the formal civil society groups that had led mobilization during prior popular uprisings (Berridge 2015) including independent NGOs (Kadoda and Hale 2015, 221), professional unions and associations (Massoud 2013, 121), and the civil service (Mann 2”
From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Berridge 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nassif, H. B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108893695 · Cited by 36
Introduction: trade unions in the global south from imperialism to the present day
Curless, G. (2016) · Labor History · doi:10.1080/0023656x.2016.1140620 · Cited by 20
Status and trends in university admissions for women in Sudan: A graphical data analysis
Hamid, M., Thron, C., & Fageeri, S. O. (2020) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100076 · Cited by 19
Verhoeven, H. (2023) · The Journal of Modern African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0022278x23000174 · Cited by 19
Leadership strategies of mobilisation and demobilisation in Sudan
Moss, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i2.869 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Berridge, W. J.
- Corresponding author
- Berridge, W. J.
- ORCID
- Berridge, W. J.
- Venue
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Published
- 2015
- OpenAlex
- W2174410037
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- Arab Spring, military authoritarianism, political Islam, post-Islamism, Islamist political thought, popular protest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Civil Uprisings in Modern Sudan: The ‘Khartoum Springs’ of 1964 and 1985. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5040/9781474219969
- The paper
- Berridge, W. J. (2015). Civil Uprisings in Modern Sudan: The ‘Khartoum Springs’ of 1964 and 1985. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219969