The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward a Definition of White Logic and White Methods
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More specifically and perniciously, the field of social statistics emerged from the need to make differentiations between white Europeans and their descendants, and other peoples.”
From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness
Hanna, A., Denton, R., Smart, A., & Smith-Loud, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372826 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonilla-Silva, E., & Zuberi, T.
- Venue
- White Logic, White Methods
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 3-28
- OpenAlex
- W4414503283
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- whiteness, racial bias in research, algorithmic fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Definition of White Logic and White Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5040/9798216386278.ch-001
- The paper
- Bonilla-Silva, E., & Zuberi, T. (2008). Toward a Definition of White Logic and White Methods. White Logic, White Methods. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216386278.ch-001
