Cited by 521Educational Research and MethodsEducational theories and practicesEducation, Philosophy, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Postpositivism And Educational Research

Abstract

This volume presents in a forthright and lively way, an account of the philosophical position generally identified as 'Postpositivistic' that undergirds much of mainstream research in education and the related social sciences. The discussion throughout is informed by recent developments in philosophy of science. Authors D. C. Phillips and Nicholas C. Burbules cite a number of interesting examples from the educational research and evaluation literature to illustrate the value of a scientific approach. Many educational researchers aspire to carry out rigorous or disciplined inquiry aimed at producing accurate (and generally 'truthful') accounts of educational phenomena and the causal psychological or social processes that lay behind them. However, many recent critics have argued that it is a mistake to believe that research can yield theories, or advance claims that are true, objective, and value-neutral. In other words, that researchers always work within frameworks that embody important (and often questionable) assumptions about values and the nature of human knowledge. This book argues that , while there is much to be learned from recent critiques, traditional scientific values and assumptions are not outmoded. The authors show students how to implement and benefit from the scientific method in ways that take into account recent critiques.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5040/9798216410935

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C.
Published
2000
OpenAlex
W4417379764
Cited by
521
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
FWCI
11.41
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational theories and practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
Keywords
post-positivism, philosophy of science, educational research, scientific method, value-laden research, research assumptions, objectivity, truth and knowledge, research evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review