The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thinking About Cultural Resource Management: Essays from the Edge
Abstract
Tom King knows cultural resource management. As one of its long-standing practitioners, a key person in developing the regulations, and a consultant, trainer, and author of several important books on the topic, King's ideas on CRM have had a large impact on contemporary practice. In this witty, sardonic book, he outlines ways of improving how cultural resources are treated in America. King tackles everything from disciplinary blinders, NAGPRA, and the National Register to flaws in the Section 106 process, avaricious consultants, and the importance of meaningful consultation with native peoples. This brief work is an important source of new ideas for anyone working in this field and a good starting point for discussion in courses and training programs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Archaeologists often implicitly claim HM as a natural component of their wider discipline.
“Archaeologists often implicitly claim HM as a natural component of their wider discipline (e.g.Colley 2004; King 2002) but there has been criticism of the conflation of heritage with archaeology (Smith and Waterton, 2009; Skeates 2000: 17; Willems 2014: 107; Seif 2017: 128).”
From Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms (2018) · cites this paper as King 2002
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative Archaeologies and Descendant Communities
Colwell, C. (2016) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937 · Cited by 178
McDavid, C., & Brock, T. P. (2015) · Ethics and Archaeological Praxis · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_11 · Cited by 22
Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms
Willems, A., Thomas, S., Castillo Mena, A., Čeginskas, V., Immonen, V., Kalakoski, I., Lähdesmäki, T., Lähdesmäki, U., Gowen-Larsen, M., Marciniak, A., et al. (2018) · Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites · doi:10.1080/13505033.2018.1559423 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- King, T. F.
- Publisher
- Rowman & Littlefield
- Published
- 2002
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
