The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Finding Meaning In Death: Terror Management among the Terminally Ill
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Terror management theory includes avoidance strategies in proximal defence, and distal defence includes cultural worldviews and self-esteem, which may underlie the eventual acceptance of death anxiety in patients with cancer.
“Among the powerful theories related to DA, terror management theory includes avoidance strategies in proximal defence, and distal defence includes cultural worldviews and self-esteem,30 which may underlie the eventual acceptance of DA in patients with cancer.”
From Psychological adjustment to death anxiety: a qualitative study of Chinese patients with advanced cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, F., Ou, M., Xia, W., & Xu, X. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080220 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Maxfield, M., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S.
- Venue
- Facing Cancer and the Fear of Death
- Publisher
- Jason Aronson
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 41-60
- OpenAlex
- W7224817764
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Jason Aronson eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Keywords
- death, meaning of death
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
