The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Walking Inside Out: Contemporary British Psychogeography
Abstract
Walking Inside Out is the first text that attempts to merge the work of literary and artist practitioners with academics to critically explore the state of psychogeography today. The collection explores contemporary psychogeographical practices, shows how a critical form of walking can highlight easily overlooked urban phenomenon, and examines the impact that everyday life in the city has on the individual. Through a variety of case studies, it offers a British perspective of international spaces, from the British metropolis to the post-communist European city. By situating the current strand of psychogeography within its historical, political and creative context along with careful consideration of the challenges it faces Walking Inside Out offers a vision for the future of the discipline.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This psychogeographic method enables researchers to sensorially and haptically experience the visual and socio-ecological trajectories borne by gra ffi ti, highlighting some of the most signi fi cant urban political ecology struggles embedded in gentri fi cation, tourism development and urban identity construction.”
From Bin ich ein Berliner? Graffiti as layered public archive and socio-ecological methodology (2019) · cites this paper as Richardson 2015
Citations
Cited by
Bin ich ein Berliner? Graffiti as layered public archive and socio-ecological methodology
Valisena, D., & Norum, R. (2019) · Green Letters · doi:10.1080/14688417.2019.1602069 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, T.
- Published
- 2015
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Walking Inside Out: Contemporary British Psychogeography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5040/9798881817565
- The paper
- Richardson, T. (2015). Walking Inside Out: Contemporary British Psychogeography. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798881817565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
