The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution of the Cardiorespiratory System in Air-Breathing Fishes
Open accessAbstract
Fishes have evolved a wide variety of air-breathing organs independently along different lineages. Of these air-breathing fishes, only some (e.g., mudskippers) venture onto land but the vast majority of them remain in water and use air as an oxygen source to different degrees. With the development of air-breathing capacity, the circulatory system of fishes has often been modified in various ways to accommodate blood to and from the newly developed air-breathing surface. However, most air-breathing fishes, except snakeheads and lungfishes, seem to lack the ability of separating O2-rich effluent blood of the airbreathing organ from O2-poor systemic venous blood during passage through the central cardiovascular system, although this has been inferred usually only from anatomical studies. Mudskippers attest to the fact that transition from aquatic to amphibious life is possible without restructuring the gross anatomy of the cardiorespiratory system, at least to some extent. Why then have some fish and ancestral vertebrates evolved the capacity of blood separation? The purpose of this paper is to review the current knowledge about the form and function of the cardiorespiratory system of selected species of air-breathing fishes (eel gobies, mudskippers, swamp eels, snakeheads and lungfishes, arranged in the order of higher specialization of the cardiorespiratory system) and discuss important issues relating to the topic.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most air-breathing fish did not evolve a separate chamber and mix deoxygenated and oxygenated blood in their circulatory system.
“While most air-breathing fish did not evolve a separate chamber and mix deoxygenated and oxygenated blood in their circulatory system (Ishimatsu, 2012), it has been hypothesized that the conus arteriosus is an ancestral characteristic of the cardiac outflow tract in early fish to direct blood flow (Icardo et al., 2002; Lorenzale et al., 2018).”
From Ancestral developmental potentials in early bony fish contributed to vertebrate water-to-land transition (2021) · cites this paper as Ishimatsu, 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bi, X.-P., 深圳518083,中国, 深., BGI-Shenzhen, S., Zhang, G.-J., 650223,中国, 中. 昆., 650223,中国, 中. 昆., Villum Center for Biodiversity Genomics, S. F. E. A. E., Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, C. A. O. S., State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, K. I. O. Z., & Villum Center for Biodiversity Genomics, S. F. E. A. E. (2021) · Zoological Research · doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2021.066 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishimatsu, A.
- Corresponding author
- Ishimatsu, Atsushi
- ORCID
- Ishimatsu, Atsushi
- Venue
- Aqua-BioScience Monographs
- Publisher
- Terrapub
- Published
- 2012-09-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-28
- ISSN
- 1882-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1882-322X
- OpenAlex
- W2006549542
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Aqua-bioscience monographs (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion)
- Nagasaki University's Academic Output SITE (Nagasaki University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- air-breathing fish, cardiorespiratory system, blood separation, air-breathing organ, mudskipper, swamp eel, snakehead, lungfish, oxygen consumption, evolution of respiration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review