Cited by 37Physiological and biochemical adaptationsFish Biology and Ecology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evolution of the Cardiorespiratory System in Air-Breathing Fishes

Open access
Ishimatsu, Atsushi·2012·Aqua-BioScience Monographs

Abstract

Fishes have evolved a wide variety of air-breathing organs independently along different lineages. Of these air-breathing fishes, only some (e.g., mudskippers) venture onto land but the vast majority of them remain in water and use air as an oxygen source to different degrees. With the development of air-breathing capacity, the circulatory system of fishes has often been modified in various ways to accommodate blood to and from the newly developed air-breathing surface. However, most air-breathing fishes, except snakeheads and lungfishes, seem to lack the ability of separating O2-rich effluent blood of the airbreathing organ from O2-poor systemic venous blood during passage through the central cardiovascular system, although this has been inferred usually only from anatomical studies. Mudskippers attest to the fact that transition from aquatic to amphibious life is possible without restructuring the gross anatomy of the cardiorespiratory system, at least to some extent. Why then have some fish and ancestral vertebrates evolved the capacity of blood separation? The purpose of this paper is to review the current knowledge about the form and function of the cardiorespiratory system of selected species of air-breathing fishes (eel gobies, mudskippers, swamp eels, snakeheads and lungfishes, arranged in the order of higher specialization of the cardiorespiratory system) and discuss important issues relating to the topic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5047/absm.2012.00501.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most air-breathing fish did not evolve a separate chamber and mix deoxygenated and oxygenated blood in their circulatory system.

    “While most air-breathing fish did not evolve a separate chamber and mix deoxygenated and oxygenated blood in their circulatory system (Ishimatsu, 2012), it has been hypothesized that the conus arteriosus is an ancestral characteristic of the cardiac outflow tract in early fish to direct blood flow (Icardo et al., 2002; Lorenzale et al., 2018).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ishimatsu, A.
Corresponding author
Ishimatsu, Atsushi
Venue
Aqua-BioScience Monographs
Publisher
Terrapub
Published
2012-09-28
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-28
ISSN
  • 1882-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1882-322X
OpenAlex
W2006549542
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aqua-bioscience monographs (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion)
  • Nagasaki University's Academic Output SITE (Nagasaki University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
air-breathing fish, cardiorespiratory system, blood separation, air-breathing organ, mudskipper, swamp eel, snakehead, lungfish, oxygen consumption, evolution of respiration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review