The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution’s waiting-time problem and suggested ways to overcome it - A critical survey
Abstract
In recent decades, severe waiting-time challenges have emerged for explanations of complex biological change within the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis. Theorists continue to propose natural mechanisms which purportedly shorten these waiting times, but do the arguments for these improvements take account of all relevant factors? Here we consider four proposed mechanisms for rapid evolution: symbiogenesis, the action of transposable elements, horizontal gene transfer, and the use of alternative evolutionary pathways. In all four cases we find that the claimed evolutionary benefit fails to take all aspects of the proposal into consideration. On the other hand, when laboratory processes analogous to evolution benefit from the teleological insights of the experimenters, we find that time no longer poses an insurmountable obstacle. By extension, it seems reasonable to propose teleology as the solution to biology’s waiting-time problem.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, LeMaster (2018) argues that none of these mechanisms really solve the waiting time problem.”
From Using statistical methods to model the fine-tuning of molecular machines and systems (2020) · cites this paper as LeMaster, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using statistical methods to model the fine-tuning of molecular machines and systems
Thorvaldsen, S., & Hössjer, O. (2020) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110352 · Cited by 15
“However, LeMaster (2018) argues that none of these mechanisms really solve the waiting time problem.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- LeMaster, J. C.
- Corresponding author
- LeMaster, James C
- Venue
- BIO-Complexity
- Publisher
- Biologic Institute
- Published
- 2018-04-27
- Volume
- 2018
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2151-7444 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883825145
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BIO-Complexity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Keywords
- waiting time problems, rapid evolution, symbiogenesis, transposable elements, horizontal gene transfer, teleology, modern evolutionary synthesis, evolutionary processes, experimental evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review