Cited by 1Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A dual-pathway architecture for stress to disrupt agency and promote habit

Open access
Giovanniello, Jacqueline, Paredes, Natalie, Weiner, Anna, Ramírez-Armenta, Kathia, Oragwam, Chukwuebuka, Uwadia, Hanniel, Yu, Abigail, Lim, Kayla +11 more·2024·Dryad

Abstract

Chronic stress can change how we learn and, thus, how we make decisions. Here we investigated the neuronal circuit mechanisms that enable this. Using a multifaceted systems neuroscience approach in male and female mice, we reveal a dual pathway, amygdala-striatal neuronal circuit architecture by which a recent history of chronic stress disrupts the action-outcome learning underlying agency and promotes the formation of inflexible habits. We found that the basolateral amygdala projection to the dorsomedial striatum is activated by rewarding events to support the action-outcome learning needed for flexible, goal-directed decision making. Chronic stress attenuates this to disrupt action-outcome learning and, therefore, agency. Conversely, the central amygdala projection to the dorsomedial striatum mediates habit formation. Following stress this pathway is progressively recruited to learning to promote the premature formation of inflexible habits. Thus, stress exerts opposing effects on two amygdala-striatal pathways to disrupt agency and promote habit. These data provide neuronal circuit insights into how chronic stress shapes learning and decision making, and help understand how stress can lead to the disrupted decision making and pathological habits that characterize substance use disorders and mental health conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5061/dryad.2jm63xt00

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giovanniello, J., Paredes, N., Weiner, A., Ramírez-Armenta, K., Oragwam, C., Uwadia, H., Yu, A., Lim, K., Pimenta, J., Vilchez, G., Nnamdi, G., Wang, A., Sehgal, M., Reis, F., Sias, A., Silva, A., Adhikari, A., Malvaez, M., & Wassum, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Dryad
Publisher
Dryad
Published
2024-12-11
OpenAlex
W6929550034
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
Locations
DRYAD (public-domain)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH135177, R01MH11908)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA046679, T32DA024635, F32DA056201)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (TL4GM118977)
  • A.P. Giannini Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
chronic stress, agency, habit formation, action-outcome learning, goal-directed behavior, basolateral amygdala, central amygdala, dorsomedial striatum, decision-making, sex differences, substance use disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review