CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Extractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesMining and Resource ManagementLatin American socio-political dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RESISTANCE AGAINST MINING EXTRACTIVISM IN CHILE

Open access
Smart, Sebastián·2018·Critical Planning
DOI 10.5070/cp8231038128
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5070/cp8231038128

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Smart, S.
Venue
Critical Planning
Publisher
California Digital Library (CDL)
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
23
Issue
0
ISSN
1522-9807 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5070/cp8231038128
OpenAlex
W2791673619
Cited by
13
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Critical Planning (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Latin American socio-political dynamics
Keywords
mining extractivism, resistance movements, extractive industries, social movements, Chile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review