Cited by 8Dermatological diseases and infestationsVector-borne infectious diseasesInsect Pest Control Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy of topical permethrin as repellent against 's bites

Open access

Abstract

Mosquitoes are the most important vectors of infectious diseases and their bites are related to several adverse skin reactions. Permethrin impregnated clothes are an efficient strategy against arthropods' bites; however, its topical efficacy as a repellent has not been well established. We studied the response to permethrin lotion 5 percent and N,N-Diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) spray 50 percent applied to the unprotected forearms of 10 volunteers. Each arm was exposed to 20 female mosquitoes of Aedes aegypti. We performed 71 bilateral comparative measurements evaluating the timing for the first bites. The average times for the arm without the product, with permethrin 5 percent, and with DEET 50 percent were: 7.9 seconds, 336.2 seconds and 7512.1 seconds. The results showed a significant difference between repellency times between either product and unprotected controls. In addition, there was a significant difference in time to first bite between permethrin and DEET treated arms (p<0.01). Permethrin affords some repellent activity against Aedes aegypti bites in this experimental setting. However, permethrin's profile of repellency was significantly inferior to that of DEET.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5070/d38pr6v8zp

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In addition to their insecticidal effect, pyrethroids have both spatial repellent and contact irritant effects, though excitorepellency is probably the most important effect when pyrethroids are used on clothing.

    “In addition to their insecticidal effect, pyrethroids have both spatial repellent and contact irritant effects,[17–19] though excitorepellency is probably the most important effect when pyrethroids are used on clothing.”

    From Pyrethroid insecticides maintain repellent effect on knock-down resistant populations of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (2018) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction identifies permethrin as a pyrethroid and describes its insecticidal effect on clothing. The Discussion suggests that topical permethrin has some repellent activity beyond its insecticidal action, but does not distinguish spatial repellency from contact irritancy. The clause about excitorepellency on clothing follows the citation and is not assessed as a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Fradin MS. Mosquitoes and mosquito repellents: a clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 931-40. PubMed
  2. Chastel C. [Reflection on 2 current viral diseases: yellow fever and dengue]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 1997; 55: 415-24. PubMed
  3. Ridel GM, Luis IR, Teja J. [Emerging and reemerging diseases: a health problem in the Americas]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2004; 15: 285-7. PubMed
  4. Deparis X, Frere B, Lamizana M et al. Efficacy of permethrin-treated uniforms in combination with DEET topical repellent for protection of French military troops in Cote d'Ivoire. J Med Entomol 2004; 41: 914-21. PubMed
  5. Young GD, Evans S. Safety and efficacy of DEET and permethrin in the prevention of arthropod attack. Mil Med 1998; 163: 324-30. PubMed
  6. Elgart ML. Medical pearl: permethrin can prevent arthropod bites and stings. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51: 289. PubMed
  7. Alexander B, Cadena H, Usma MC et al. Laboratory and field evaluations of a repellent soap containing diethyl toluamide (DEET) and permethrin against phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995; 52: 169-73. PubMed
  8. Taplin D, Meinking TL. Pyrethrins and pyrethroids in dermatology. Arch Dermatol 1990; 126: 213-21. PubMed
  9. Molina R, Miro G, Galvez R et al. Evaluation of a spray of permethrin and pyriproxyfen for the protection of dogs against Phlebotomus perniciosus. Vet Rec 2006; 159: 206-9. PubMed
  10. Miot HA, Batistella RF, Batista Kde A et al. Comparative study of the topical effectiveness of the Andiroba oil (Carapa guianensis) and DEET 50% as repellent for Aedes sp. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2004; 46: 253-6. PubMed
  11. Soderlund DM, Clark JM, Sheets LP et al. Mechanisms of pyrethroid neurotoxicity: implications for cumulative risk assessment. Toxicology 2002; 171: 3-59. PubMed
  12. Macoris Mde L, Andrighetti MT, Otrera VC et al. Association of insecticide use and alteration on Aedes aegypti susceptibility status. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2007; 102: 895-900. PubMed

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miot, H. A., Ferreira, D. P., Mendes, F. G., Carrenho, F. R. H., Amui, I. D. O., Carneiro, C. A. S., & Madeira, N. G.
Venue
Dermatology Online Journal
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
1-1
ISSN
1087-2108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W157453423
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Dermatology Online Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
tick repellents, tick bites, tick-borne diseases, repellent efficacy
MeSH terms
Aedes, Animals, Brazil, DEET, Female, Humans, Insect Bites and Stings, Insect Repellents, Mosquito Control, Probability, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Permethrin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review